Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36339013›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2020

Potential influence of rapid diagnostics on timeliness of management decisions for patients with positive blood cultures.

Jennifer M Grant, Charlene Porter, Marthe K Charles, Elizabeth A Bryce, Titus Wong, Aleksandra Stefanovic, Salomeh Shajari, Diane L Roscoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer M GrantDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Charlene PorterDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Costal Health Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Marthe K CharlesDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Costal Health Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Elizabeth A BryceDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Titus WongDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Aleksandra StefanovicDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Salomeh ShajariDepartment of Quality and Patient Safety, Vancouver Costal Health Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Diane L RoscoeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Accelerate Pheno system (AXDX) provides rapid identification (ID; 90 minutes) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST; approximately 7 hours) from positive blood culture (BC) bottles. We assessed the potential of AXDX results to influence more timely antibiotic interventions with a convenience sample of 158 positive BCs. Methods: BCs with a mono-microbial Gram stain likely to be on the AXDX panel were run in parallel with the standard of care (SOC). Using results from the SOC, the medical microbiologist on call (MMOC) noted interventions made at the time of BC Gram stain and when ID and AST results were available. The timing of MMOC intervention was noted and compared with fastest potential SOC time and AXDX time. Results: Of 158 specimens selected for analysis, 144 were evaluable. ID was available 11.9 hours and AST 27.7 hours faster than SOC. Correct ID was provided for 85.2% of specimens and AST for 59.0% of specimens, with 97.5% essential agreement compared with the SOC. One hundred and thirteen clinical interventions were made on 100 specimens: 54.9% were narrowing; 33.6%, escalation; 6.2%, consultation with ID; and 3.5%, further investigation. If AXDX data had been used immediately once available, interventions would have been possible 24 hours earlier for ID interventions and 39 hours earlier for AST results. Conclusions: Results from rapid diagnostic panels such as AXDX have the potential to support timely antimicrobial de-escalation and other decisions to benefit patients, especially if paired with stewardship interventions.

Indexed as

antibiotic stewardshipbacterial infectionsblood culturerapid diagnosticssepsis

Identifiers

PMID36339013
PMCPMC9603315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.