Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338960›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2022

Vignette of

Sachin Kumar Verma, Chandan Kumar Singh, Jyoti Taunk, Gayacharan, Dinesh Chandra Joshi, Sanjay Kalia, Nrisingha Dey, Amit Kumar Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unlocking the potential of rice bean (Journal of food composition and analysis : an official publication of the United Nations University, International Network of Food Data Systems · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Multi-environment phenotyping of ricebean (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Crop assemblages in the highlands of Odisha: toward an ethnoarchaeobotanical perspective of crop choices.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Salinity stress tolerance inFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sachin Kumar VermaICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Chandan Kumar SinghICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Jyoti TaunkDepartment of Biotechnology, University Centre for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India.
GayacharanICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Dinesh Chandra JoshiICAR-Vivekananda Institute of Hill Agriculture (Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan), Uttarakhand, Almora, India.
Sanjay KaliaDepartment of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India.
Nrisingha DeyInstitute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Amit Kumar SinghICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genus

Indexed as

Domesticationdomestication-related traitsgenomicsprogenitorsVignawild

Identifiers

PMID36338960
PMCPMC9634637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.