Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338818›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2022

After the storm-Perspectives on the taxonomy of

Nanzhen Qiao, Stijn Wittouck, Paola Mattarelli, Jinshui Zheng, Sarah Lebeer, Giovanna E Felis, Michael G Gänzle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. JDS communications · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Comparative genomic analysis ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nanzhen QiaoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada T6G 2P5.
Stijn WittouckDepartment of Bioscience Engineering, Research Group Environmental Ecology and Applied Microbiology, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
Paola MattarelliDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 42, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Jinshui ZhengState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Sarah LebeerDepartment of Bioscience Engineering, Research Group Environmental Ecology and Applied Microbiology, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
Giovanna E FelisDepartment of Biotechnology, Verona University Culture Collection, University of Verona, Strada le Grazie, 15, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Michael G GänzleDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada T6G 2P5.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2020, a taxonomic reorganization of the lactic acid bacteria reclassified over 300 species in 7 genera and 2 families into one family, the

Identifiers

PMID36338818
PMCPMC9623751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.