Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338799›Full record

ReviewHealth equity2022

Systematic Review: Impact of Social Determinants of Health on the Management and Prognosis of Gallstone Disease.

Benoît Dupont, Olivier Dejardin, Véronique Bouvier, Marie-Astrid Piquet, Arnaud Alves

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health equity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Longitudinal Study of Comorbidities and Clinical Outcomes in Persons with Gallstone Disease Using Electronic Health Records.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benoît DupontDepartement d'Hepato-Gastroenterologie et Nutrition, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Univ, Caen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7858-0581
Olivier Dejardin"Anticipe" U1086 INSERM-UCBN, "Cancers & Preventions," Team Labelled "League Against Cancer," UNICAEN, Normandie Univ, CAEN, France.
Véronique Bouvier"Anticipe" U1086 INSERM-UCBN, "Cancers & Preventions," Team Labelled "League Against Cancer," UNICAEN, Normandie Univ, CAEN, France.
Marie-Astrid PiquetDepartement d'Hepato-Gastroenterologie et Nutrition, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Univ, Caen, France.
Arnaud Alves"Anticipe" U1086 INSERM-UCBN, "Cancers & Preventions," Team Labelled "League Against Cancer," UNICAEN, Normandie Univ, CAEN, France.
Inserm · FRNormandie Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Due to its prevalence, gallstone disease is a major public health issue. It affects diverse patient populations across various socioeconomic levels. Socioeconomic and geographic deprivation may impact both morbidity and mortality associated with digestive diseases, such as biliary tract disease. Aim: The aim of this systematic review was to review the available data on the impact of socioeconomic determinants and geographic factors on gallstone disease and its complications. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched by two investigators to retrieve studies about the impact of income, insurance status, hospital status, education level, living areas, and deprivation indices on gallstone disease. Thirty-seven studies were selected for this review. Results: Socially disadvantaged populations appear to be more frequently affected by complicated or severe forms of gallstone disease. The prognosis of biliary tract disease is poor in these populations regardless of patient status, and increased morbidity and mortality were observed for acute cholangitis or subsequent cholecystectomy. Limited or delayed access and low-quality therapeutic interventions could be among the potential causes for this poor prognosis. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that socioeconomic determinants impact the management of gallstone disease. Enhanced knowledge of these parameters could contribute to improved public health policies to manage these diseases.

Indexed as

acute pancreatitisbiliary tract diseasescholecystectomyhealth care disparitiessocial class

Identifiers

PMID36338799
PMCPMC9629913
OpenAlexW4307720711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.