ArticleECS sensors plus2022
A Strategy for Accessing Nanobody-Based Electrochemical Sensors for Analyte Detection in Complex Media.
Article in ECS sensors plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Study of Various Functionalization Steps for Ultrasensitive Detection of SARS-CoV-2 with Direct Laser-Functionalized Au-LIG Electrochemical Sensors.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Beyond the Gold-Thiol Paradigm: Exploring Alternative Interfaces for Electrochemical Nucleic Acid-Based Sensing.ACS sensors · 2024Review
- Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Immunosensors Using Nanobodies as Biocompatible Sniffer Tools of Agricultural Contaminants and Human Disease Biomarkers.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Exploring phytochemical composition, photocatalytic, antibacterial, and antifungal efficacies of Au NPs supported by Cymbopogon flexuosus essential oil.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A Strategy for Accessing Nanobody-Based Electrochemical Sensors for Analyte Detection in Complex Media.ECS sensors plus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nanobodies are single variable domain antibodies isolated from camelids and are rapidly distinguishing themselves as ideal recognition elements in biosensors due to their comparative stability, ease of production and isolation, and high binding affinities. However, transducing analyte binding by nanobodies in real time is challenging, as most nanobodies do not directly produce an optical or electrical signal upon target recognition. Here, we report a general strategy to fabricate sensitive and selective electrochemical sensors incorporating nanobodies for detecting target analytes in heterogeneous media, such as cell lysate. Graphite felt can be covalently functionalized with recombinant HaloTag-modified nanobodies. Subsequent encapsulation with a thin layer of a hydrogel using a vapor deposition process affords encapsulated electrodes that directly display a decrease in current upon antigen binding, without added redox mediators. Differential pulse voltammetry affords clear and consistent decreases in electrode current across multiple electrode samples for specific antigen concentrations. The change in observed current vs increasing antigen concentration follows Langmuir binding characteristics, as expected. Importantly, selective and repeatable target binding in unpurified cell lysate is only demonstrated by the encapsulated electrode, with an antigen detection limit of ca. 30 pmol, whereas bare electrodes lacking encapsulation produce numerous false positive signals in control experiments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.