ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
3D deep learning versus the current methods for predicting tumor invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma based on high-resolution computed tomography images.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative diagnostic accuracy of radiomics, deep learning, and hybrid AI for invasiveness stratification of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Standalone deep learning versus experts for diagnosis lung cancer on chest computed tomography: a systematic review.European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning for the invasiveness assessment of ground-glass nodules with fine segmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Optical sensor for fast and accurate lung cancer detection with tissue autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- The Present State and Potential Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the invasiveness of pure ground-glass nodules based on dual-head ResNet technique.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Advances in artificial intelligence applications in the field of lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Application value of a computer-aided diagnosis and management system for the detection of lung nodules.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Different pathological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma lead to different treatment decisions and prognoses, and it is clinically important to distinguish invasive lung adenocarcinoma from preinvasive adenocarcinoma (adenocarcinoma Methods: In this study, we used a deep learning approach based on 3D conventional networks to automatically predict the invasiveness of pulmonary nodules. A total of 901 early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment at Shanghai Chest Hospital between November 2015 and March 2017 were retrospectively included and randomly assigned to a training set (n=814) or testing set 1 (n=87). We subsequently included 116 patients who underwent surgical treatment and intraoperative frozen section between April 2019 and January 2020 to form testing set 2. We compared the performance of our deep learning approach in predicting tumor invasiveness with that of intraoperative frozen section analysis and human experts (radiologists and surgeons). Results: The deep learning approach yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.946 for distinguishing preinvasive adenocarcinoma from invasive lung adenocarcinoma in the testing set 1, which is significantly higher than the AUCs of human experts (P<0.05). In testing set 2, the deep learning approach distinguished invasive adenocarcinoma from preinvasive adenocarcinoma with an AUC of 0.862, which is higher than that of frozen section analysis (0.755, P=0.043), senior thoracic surgeons (0.720, P=0.006), radiologists (0.766, P>0.05) and junior thoracic surgeons (0.768, P>0.05). Conclusions: We developed a deep learning model that achieved comparable performance to intraoperative frozen section analysis in determining tumor invasiveness. The proposed method may contribute to clinical decisions related to the extent of surgical resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.