Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338691›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

A nomogram based on radiomics signature and deep-learning signature for preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.

Dawei Wang, Yiqi Hu, Chenao Zhan, Qi Zhang, Yiping Wu, Tao Ai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Fusion of shallow and deep features fromQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dawei WangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yiqi HuDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chenao ZhanDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yiping WuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Tao AiDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a nomogram based on radiomics signature and deep-learning signature for predicting the axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in breast cancer. Methods: A total of 151 patients were assigned to a training cohort (n = 106) and a test cohort (n = 45) in this study. Radiomics features were extracted from DCE-MRI images, and deep-learning features were extracted by VGG-16 algorithm. Seven machine learning models were built using the selected features to evaluate the predictive value of radiomics or deep-learning features for the ALN metastasis in breast cancer. A nomogram was then constructed based on the multivariate logistic regression model incorporating radiomics signature, deep-learning signature, and clinical risk factors. Results: Five radiomics features and two deep-learning features were selected for machine learning model construction. In the test cohort, the AUC was above 0.80 for most of the radiomics models except DecisionTree and ExtraTrees. In addition, the K-nearest neighbor (KNN), XGBoost, and LightGBM models using deep-learning features had AUCs above 0.80 in the test cohort. The nomogram, which incorporated the radiomics signature, deep-learning signature, and MRI-reported LN status, showed good calibration and performance with the AUC of 0.90 (0.85-0.96) in the training cohort and 0.90 (0.80-0.99) in the test cohort. The DCA showed that the nomogram could offer more net benefit than radiomics signature or deep-learning signature. Conclusions: Both radiomics and deep-learning features are diagnostic for predicting ALN metastasis in breast cancer. The nomogram incorporating radiomics and deep-learning signatures can achieve better prediction performance than every signature used alone.

Indexed as

axillary lymph node metastasisbreast cancerdeep learningpredictionradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36338691
PMCPMC9633001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.