Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338685›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

Efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: Evidence from randomized controlled trials.

Zilan Wang, Longyuan Li, Xingyu Yang, Haiying Teng, Xiaoxiao Wu, Zhouqing Chen, Zhong Wang, Gang Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zilan WangDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Longyuan LiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xingyu YangDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Haiying TengDepartment of Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xiaoxiao WuDepartment of Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zhouqing ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zhong WangDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pain relief is one of the main objectives of radiotherapy for cancer patients with bone metastases. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) enables precise delivery of a higher dosage to the target area. Several trials have reported comparisons between SBRT and conventional radiotherapy (cRT) in patients with painful bone metastasis. However, the results of those investigations were inconsistent, and no systematic review or meta-analysis has been done till now. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov up to May 1, 2022 for relevant studies. Patients with painful bone metastasis who received SBRT or cRT were included. The primary outcome was the patients' pain response rate at three months. The secondary outcomes included the rate of pain responders at one month and six months, oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) use, and any adverse events. STATA software 12.0 was used for the statistical analysis. Results: We collected 533 patients' data from 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), there was a significant difference of pain response rate at 3 months between two groups (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.12-1.77, Conclusion: This study shows that for painful bone metastases, patients with SBRT experienced better pain relief 3 months after radiation than patients with cRT, and SBRT did not increase the incidence of adverse events. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-6-0099/, identifier INPLASY202260099.

Indexed as

bone metastasesconventional external radiationmeta-analysispain reliefstereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36338685
PMCPMC9627033
OpenAlexW4306843015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.