SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022
Efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: Evidence from randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stereotactic Body and Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Osteosarcoma Bone Metastases.Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical Value of Bone Radiotherapy in a Prospective Cohort of Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Anti-CDK4/6.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of stereotactic body radiation therapy in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Impacts of radiation therapy on quality of life and pain relief in patients with bone metastases.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pain relief is one of the main objectives of radiotherapy for cancer patients with bone metastases. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) enables precise delivery of a higher dosage to the target area. Several trials have reported comparisons between SBRT and conventional radiotherapy (cRT) in patients with painful bone metastasis. However, the results of those investigations were inconsistent, and no systematic review or meta-analysis has been done till now. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov up to May 1, 2022 for relevant studies. Patients with painful bone metastasis who received SBRT or cRT were included. The primary outcome was the patients' pain response rate at three months. The secondary outcomes included the rate of pain responders at one month and six months, oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) use, and any adverse events. STATA software 12.0 was used for the statistical analysis. Results: We collected 533 patients' data from 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), there was a significant difference of pain response rate at 3 months between two groups (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.12-1.77, Conclusion: This study shows that for painful bone metastases, patients with SBRT experienced better pain relief 3 months after radiation than patients with cRT, and SBRT did not increase the incidence of adverse events. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-6-0099/, identifier INPLASY202260099.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.