Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338676›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Deep learning in bladder cancer imaging: A review.

Mingyang Li, Zekun Jiang, Wei Shen, Haitao Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mingyang LiDepartment of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zekun JiangMinistry of Education (MoE) Key Lab of Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence (AI) Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Wei ShenMinistry of Education (MoE) Key Lab of Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence (AI) Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Haitao LiuDepartment of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) is a rapidly developing field in machine learning (ML). The concept of deep learning originates from research on artificial neural networks and is an upgrade of traditional neural networks. It has achieved great success in various domains and has shown potential in solving medical problems, particularly when using medical images. Bladder cancer (BCa) is the tenth most common cancer in the world. Imaging, as a safe, noninvasive, and relatively inexpensive technique, is a powerful tool to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. In this review, we provide an overview of the latest progress in the application of deep learning to the imaging assessment of bladder cancer. First, we review the current deep learning approaches used for bladder segmentation. We then provide examples of how deep learning helps in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment management of bladder cancer using medical images. Finally, we summarize the current limitations of deep learning and provide suggestions for future improvements.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebladder cancercomputed tomographydeep learningmagnetic resonance imagingmedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID36338676
PMCPMC9631317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.