Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338664›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2022

Isolation efficiency of collagenase and EDTA for the culture of corneal endothelial cells.

Kim Santerre, Stéphanie Proulx

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kim SanterreCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) de Québec - Université Laval, axe médecine régénératrice, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, Québec, QC, Canada.
Stéphanie ProulxCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) de Québec - Université Laval, axe médecine régénératrice, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, Québec, QC, Canada.
Université Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Tissue engineering of the corneal endothelium, as well as cell therapy, has been proposed as an alternative approach for the treatment of corneal endotheliopathies. These approaches require in vitro amplification of functional corneal endothelial cells (CECs). The goal of this study was to compare two common isolation methods, collagenase A and EDTA (EDTA), and determine whether they influence cell viability, morphology, and barrier function. Methods: Human eye bank research-grade corneas were used to isolate and cultivate CECs. All donors were more than 40 years old. Two Descemet membranes from the same donor were used separately to compare the collagenase A and EDTA cell isolation methods. The number of isolated cells, cell viability, morphology, and barrier functionality were compared. Results: A higher isolation efficiency of viable CECs and a higher circularity index (endothelial morphology) were obtained using collagenase A. Passage 3 cells presented similar barrier functionalities regardless of the isolation method. Conclusions: This study showed that isolation of CECs using collagenase A yields higher isolation efficiency than EDTA, delaying the loss of endothelial morphology for early passage cells.

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsEndothelium, CornealAdultCell SeparationCollagenasesEdetic AcidHumansCollagenasesEdetic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36338664
PMCPMC9603909
OpenAlexW4308552990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.