Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338632›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of colonic and rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A propensity score matching analysis.

Chen Li, Yunwei Lu, Meng-Meng Zhang, Hao Wu, Han Li, Ying-Jiang Ye, Kewei Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chen LiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yunwei LuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Meng-Meng ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hao WuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Han LiDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Ying-Jiang YeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kewei JiangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Research, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University People's Hospital · CNPeking University · CNShandong First Medical University · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (cGIST) and rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (rGIST) are two rare subtypes of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). The view that colonic and rectal carcinoma are different is generally accepted; however, whether there is a difference between cGIST and rGIST is still unknown. Here, we aimed to provide evidence for future clinical management and research by comparing the differences between the two types of GIST in the above-mentioned aspects. Methods: Patients were enrolled from three medical centers in China and published literature was collected following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Propensity score matching was used to eliminate differences between cohorts. Results: Between cGIST and rGIST patients, significant differences were observed in age, tumor size, mitotic index, NIH risk category, growth pattern, and symptoms. Adjuvant therapy is used in a high proportion of cGIST patients, and neoadjuvant therapy is used in a high proportion of rGIST patients. Although local resection is the main surgical method in both cohorts, the proportion is higher in cGIST patients. The overall survival of rGIST patients was better than that of the cGIST patients before propensity score matching (PSM). Interestingly, no significant differences in prognosis were observed after PSM. Conclusions: Although there were significant differences between cGIST and rGIST patients in baseline characteristics, clinicopathological features, treatment choice, and overall survival rate before PSM, no significant differences in long-term survival were observed between the two groups after PSM. In our study, there may be no differences in the tumor entity between cGIST and rGIST.

Indexed as

colonic neoplasmgastrointestinal stromal tumorspropensity score matchingrectal neopalsmstata

Identifiers

PMID36338632
PMCPMC9634480
OpenAlexW4306974460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.