Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338581›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2022

Differential diagnoses of gallbladder tumors using CT-based deep learning.

Hiroaki Fujita, Taiichi Wakiya, Keinosuke Ishido, Norihisa Kimura, Hayato Nagase, Taishu Kanda, Masashi Matsuzaka, Yoshihiro Sasaki, Kenichi Hakamada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Applications of artificial intelligence in biliary tract cancers.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  10. Deep-learning models for differentiation of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and gallbladder cancer on ultrasound.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroaki FujitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3259-7054
Taiichi WakiyaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-7736
Keinosuke IshidoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0342-1199
Norihisa KimuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0585-3024
Hayato NagaseDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki Japan.
Taishu KandaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2839-3347
Masashi MatsuzakaDepartment of Medical Informatics Hirosaki University Hospital Hirosaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8199-3037
Yoshihiro SasakiDepartment of Medical Informatics Hirosaki University Hospital Hirosaki Japan.
Kenichi HakamadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6513-1202
Hirosaki University · JPHirosaki University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The differential diagnosis between gallbladder cancer (GBC) and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) remains quite challenging, and can possibly lead to improper surgery. This study aimed to distinguish between XGC and GBC by combining computed tomography (CT) images and deep learning (DL) to maximize the therapeutic success of surgery. Methods: We collected a dataset, including preoperative CT images, from 28 cases of GBC and 21 XGC patients undergoing surgery at our facility. It was subdivided into training and validation (n = 40), and test (n = 9) datasets. We built a CT patch-based discriminating model using a residual convolutional neural network and employed 5-fold cross-validation. The discriminating performance of the model was analyzed in the test dataset. Results: Of the 40 patients in the training dataset, GBC and XGC were observed in 21 (52.5%), and 19 (47.5%) patients, respectively. A total of 61 126 patches were extracted from the 40 patients. In the validation dataset, the average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 98.8%, 98.0%, and 98.5%, respectively. Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.9985. In the test dataset, which included 11 738 patches, the discriminating accuracy for GBC patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (n = 3) was insufficient (61.8%). However, the discriminating model demonstrated high accuracy (98.2%) and AUC (0.9893) for cases other than those receiving NAC. Conclusion: Our CT-based DL model exhibited high discriminating performance in patients with GBC and XGC. Our study proposes a novel concept for selecting the appropriate procedure and avoiding unnecessary invasive measures.

Indexed as

deep learninggallbladder cancerneural networkprecision medicinexanthogranulomatous cholecystitis

Identifiers

PMID36338581
PMCPMC9628252
OpenAlexW4293250298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.