ArticleAJOG global reports2022
Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Significance of Bishop score in single vs. double balloon catheterization for induction in labor; a meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Time of day of induction impacts the total duration of labor.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2026Article
- Is indication for induction of labor associated with mode of delivery in term first births? A Norwegian registry-based study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness of Labour Induction Methods: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Timing of Prostin E2 Administration After Poor Response to Propess: Impact on Induction-to-Birth Interval and Maternal/Neonatal Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Article
- Sleep disturbances in late pregnancy: associations with induction of labor.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- The Correct Indication to Induce Labour in a Swiss Cantonal Hospital.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Trends in labor induction and perinatal outcomes: A decade comparison before and after the ARRIVE trial.Tzu chi medical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen undergoing induction of labor should be empowered with accurate information.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine the characteristics of and indications for induction of labor and delivery outcomes to help inform practice and counseling. STUDY
designWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor over a 3-month period in a tertiary-level hospital in the Republic of Ireland. Data were obtained from paper and electronic registries. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed on data collected.
resultsThere were 1084 women delivered, with an induction rate of 46.0% (n=499). Primiparous women were more likely to be induced compared with multiparous women (51.4%; n=254/494 vs 41.5%; n=245/590;
conclusionInformation on induction of labor can aid in the guidance and education of women undergoing the process, educate clinicians for appropriate counseling, and facilitate shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.