ReviewJACC. Asia2021
Physiology-Based Revascularization: A New Approach to Plan and Optimize Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Review in JACC. Asia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06376630 (Study of Microvascular Dysfunction, Coronary Flow Reserve and Cardioprotective Effect of Early Intravenously Administration of Esmolol in Patients With Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of Microvascular Dysfunction, Coronary Flow Reserve and Cardioprotective Effect of Early Intravenously Administration of Esmolol in Patients With Myocardial Infarction
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nomogram based on virtual hyperemic pullback pressure gradients for predicting the suboptimal post-PCI QFR outcome after stent implantation.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Coronary Physiology to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Why, When, and How.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Review
- Angiographic Findings and Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Differential Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve Measured After Coronary Stent Implantation by Left Ventricular Dysfunction.JACC. Asia · 2024Article
- Differences in severity of diffuse and focal coronary stenosis between visual and quantitative assessment.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 1.JACC. Asia · 2023Review
- Coronary Angiography Upgraded by Imaging Post-Processing: Present and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A Correct FFR Trace Interpretation Is Important for a Clinical Decision.JACC. Case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary physiological assessment using fractional flow reserve or nonhyperemic pressure ratios has become a standard of care for patients with coronary atherosclerotic disease. However, most evidence has focused on the pre-interventional use of physiological assessment to aid revascularization decision-making, whereas post-interventional physiological assessment has not been well established. Although evidence for supporting the role of post-interventional physiological assessment to optimize immediate revascularization results and long-term prognosis has been reported, a more thorough understanding of these data is crucial in incorporating post-interventional physiological assessment into daily practice. Recent scientific efforts have also focused on the potential role of pre-interventional fractional flow reserve or nonhyperemic pressure ratio pullback tracings to characterize patterns of coronary atherosclerotic disease to better predict post-interventional physiological outcomes, and thereby identify the appropriate revascularization target. Pre-interventional pullback tracings with dedicated post-processing methods can provide characterization of focal versus diffuse disease or major gradient versus minor gradient stenosis, which would result in different post-interventional physiological results. This review provides a comprehensive look at the current evidence regarding the evolving role of physiological assessment as a functional optimization tool for the entire process of revascularization, and not merely as a pre-interventional tool for revascularization decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.