Early Revision Rates of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Intellijoint HIP Computer Navigation System: A Study From the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry of 1911 Procedures.

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for symptomatic hip osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to determine the revision outcome of commercially available navigation technologies. Methods: Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry from January 2016 to December 2020 included all primary THA procedures performed for osteoarthritis. Procedures using the Intellijoint HIP navigation system were identified and compared to procedures using "other" computer navigation systems and to nonnavigated procedures. The cumulative percent revision (CPR) was compared between the 3 groups using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age and gender. Results: There were 1911 procedures that used the Intellijoint system, 4081 used "other" computer navigation systems, and 160,661 were nonnavigated procedures. The all-cause 2-year CPR rate for the Intellijoint system was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.6), compared to 2.2% (95% CI, 1.8-2.8) for other navigated cases and 2.2% (95% CI, 2.1-2.3) for nonnavigated cases. A prosthesis analysis identified the Paragon/Acetabular Shell THAs combined with the Intellijoint system to have a higher (3.4%) rate of revision than nonnavigated THAs (hazard ratio = 2.00 [95% CI, 1.01-4.00], Conclusions: The preliminary data presented demonstrate no statistical difference in all-cause revision rates when comparing the Intellijoint system with "other" navigation systems and "nonnavigated" approaches for primary THAs. Level of evidence: III (National registry analysis).