Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338276›Full record

ArticleJournal of family and economic issues2022

Perceived Economic Uncertainty and Fertility Intentions in Couples: A Dyadic Extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour.

Camilla Matera, Lars Dommermuth, Silvia Bacci, Bruno Bertaccini, Alessandra Minello, Daniele Vignoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family and economic issues, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Family Life Courses, Uncertain Futures, and the Changing World of Work: State-of-the-Art and Prospects.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2024
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Camilla MateraDepartment of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology (FORLILPSI), University of Florence, Via Di San Salvi, 12-Pad. 26, 50135 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1791-4074
Lars DommermuthResearch Department, Statistics Norway, Pb 2633 St. Hanshaugen, 0121 Oslo, Norway.
Silvia BacciDepartment of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications "G. Parenti" (DISIA), University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 39, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Bruno BertacciniDepartment of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications "G. Parenti" (DISIA), University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 39, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Alessandra MinelloDepartment of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications "G. Parenti" (DISIA), University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 39, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Daniele VignoliDepartment of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications "G. Parenti" (DISIA), University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 39, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By adopting a dyadic extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1991), this study examined whether perceived economic uncertainty affects fertility intentions. Three-hundred thirty one heterosexual couples living in Italy participated in a randomized between-group experimental study, in which we manipulated perceived economic uncertainty (low vs. high vs. control). The participants subsequently completed a questionnaire measuring their attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and fertility intentions. We employed Structural Equation Modelling in estimating the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. The model showed a good fit to the data. Women's attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control were influenced by the high economic uncertain scenario, whereas among men these variables were affected only by the positive economic scenario. Attitudes and perceived behavioral control were significant predictors of fertility intentions for both sexes. Significant partner effects were observed as well. These findings suggest that fertility plans should be examined by adopting a dyadic perspective, as individuals' intentions are affected not only by their own beliefs, but also by those of their partners.

Indexed as

APIMAttitudesDyadic perspectiveFertilityIntentionsTheory of planned behavior

Identifiers

PMID36338276
PMCPMC9628329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.