Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338263›Full record

ReviewClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2022

Cancer Biomarkers in Liquid Biopsy for Early Detection of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Galo Duque, Carlos Manterola, Tamara Otzen, Cristina Arias, Dennise Palacios, Miriann Mora, Bryan Galindo, Juan Pablo Holguín, Lorena Albarracín

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Galo DuqueMedical Sciences PhD Program, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1306-9392
Carlos ManterolaMedical Sciences PhD Program, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Tamara OtzenMedical Sciences PhD Program, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Cristina AriasFaculty of Medicine, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-5109
Dennise PalaciosFaculty of Medicine, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Miriann MoraMedical Sciences PhD Program, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Bryan GalindoFaculty of Medicine, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Juan Pablo HolguínMedical Sciences PhD Program, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Lorena AlbarracínMedical Sciences PhD Program, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-1040
Universidad de La Frontera · CLUniversidad del Azuay · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common neoplasm in women worldwide. Liquid biopsy (LB) is a non-invasive diagnostic technique that allows the analysis of biomarkers in different body fluids, particularly in peripheral blood and also in urine, saliva, nipple discharge, volatile respiratory fluids, nasal secretions, breast milk, and tears. The objective was to analyze the available evidence related to the use of biomarkers obtained by LB for the early diagnosis of BC. Methods: Articles related to the use of biomarkers for the early diagnosis of BC due to LB, published between 2010 and 2022, from the databases (WoS, EMBASE, PubMed, and SCOPUS) were included. The MInCir diagnostic scale was applied in the articles to determine their methodological quality (MQ). Descriptive statistics were used, as well as determination of weighted averages of each variable, to analyze the extracted data. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve values for specific biomarkers (individual or in panels) are described. Results: In this systematic review (SR), 136 articles met the selection criteria, representing 17 709 patients with BC. However, 95.6% were case-control studies. In 96.3% of cases, LB was performed in peripheral blood samples. Most of the articles were based on microRNA (miRNA) analysis. The mean MQ score was 25/45 points. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve values for specific biomarkers (individual or in panels) have been found. Conclusions: The determination of biomarkers through LB is a useful mechanism for the diagnosis of BC. The analysis of miRNA in peripheral blood is the most studied methodology. Our results indicate that LB has a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of BC, especially in early stages.

Indexed as

breast cancerBreast neoplasmsearly diagnosisliquid biopsymicroRNAssensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

PMID36338263
PMCPMC9634213
OpenAlexW4308551722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.