Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338252›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2022

Pulmonologists' work and clinical life during the COVID-19 pandemic: a society-led survey.

Pia Iben Pietersen, Lars Konge, Rasmus Jørgensen, Daiana Stolz, Amy Farr, Christian B Laursen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pia Iben PietersenInnovation and Research Unit of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Simulation Center (SimC), Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5718-3635
Lars KongeCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for HR and Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rasmus JørgensenSimulation Center (SimC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Daiana StolzClinic for Respiratory Medicine and Pulmonary Cell Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Amy FarrEuropean Respiratory Society, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christian B LaursenDept of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6382-9906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continuous and ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highly affected pulmonologists and pulmonology residents worldwide. To identify where additional work and resources must be focused, it is important to explore on what parameters the pulmonologists and residents are challenged. We present the results of a society-led survey on pulmonologists' and pulmonology residents' work and clinical life during the pandemic. A total of 579 pulmonologists and pulmonology residents completed the survey (5.9% of the European Respiratory Society's physician members) and most respondents answered that they have had sufficient training on how to handle patients with COVID-19 (

Identifiers

PMID36338252
PMCPMC9584574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.