ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022
Fibrous hamartoma of infancy with bone destruction of the tibia: A case report.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fibrous hamartoma of infancy in the lumbosacral region: A case report of a rare soft-tissue tumor.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFibrous hamartoma of infancy (FHI) is a rare disease of infancy with unknown etiology. The disease mainly involves soft tissue, has no specific clinical manifestations, and is difficult to diagnose. At present, the diagnosis is mainly confirmed by histopathological examination, and the main treatment is surgical resection of the pathological tissue, which is prone to recurrence. CASE SUMMARY: A five-month-old female patient was admitted to our hospital with swelling in the right calf. Two biopsies were performed in our hospital and another hospital, respectively, confirming the diagnosis as fibrous hamartoma. After exclusion of surgical contraindications, resection was performed with clear margins of 1 cm. Radiographic examination showed tumor recurrence more than four months after the operation, and surgery was performed again to extend the resection margins to 1.5 cm. The patient is recovering well, and after a follow-up of 36 mo, shows no signs of recurrence.
conclusionOur case report demonstrates that FHI should be considered in the differential diagnosis for a lower extremity mass with bone destruction. For FHI with bone destruction and unclear boundaries, excision margins of 1.5 cm could be superior to margins of 1 cm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.