Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338177›Full record

ReviewClinical infection in practice2021

Best practice standards for the delivery of NHS infection services in the United Kingdom.

Natasha V D V Ratnaraja, Angharad P Davies, Bridget L Atkins, Rishi Dhillon, Nikunj Mahida, Samuel Moses, Joanne Herman, Anna Checkley, David Partridge, Martin J Llewelyn

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical infection in practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A 'giant leap' for UK NHS infection services?Clinical infection in practice · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha V D V RatnarajaDepartment of Microbiology, Pathology Block, Fourth Floor, West Wing, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom.
Angharad P DaviesThe Royal College of Pathologists, 6 Alie Street, London E1 8QT, United Kingdom.
Bridget L AtkinsClinical Services Committee, British Infection Association, 2a St George's Court, St George's Park, Kirkham, Preston PR4 2EF, United Kingdom.
Rishi DhillonClinical Services Committee, British Infection Association, 2a St George's Court, St George's Park, Kirkham, Preston PR4 2EF, United Kingdom.
Nikunj MahidaClinical Services Committee, British Infection Association, 2a St George's Court, St George's Park, Kirkham, Preston PR4 2EF, United Kingdom.
Samuel MosesClinical Services Committee, British Infection Association, 2a St George's Court, St George's Park, Kirkham, Preston PR4 2EF, United Kingdom.
Joanne HermanClinical Services Committee, British Infection Association, 2a St George's Court, St George's Park, Kirkham, Preston PR4 2EF, United Kingdom.
Anna CheckleyClinical Services Committee, British Infection Association, 2a St George's Court, St George's Park, Kirkham, Preston PR4 2EF, United Kingdom.
David PartridgeClinical Services Committee, British Infection Association, 2a St George's Court, St George's Park, Kirkham, Preston PR4 2EF, United Kingdom.
Martin J LlewelynThe Royal College of Physicians, 11 St Andrews Pl, London NW1 4LE, United Kingdom.
Royal College of Pathologists · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBBritish Infection Association · GBNorthern General Hospital · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection expertise in the NHS has historically been provided predominantly by hospital-based medical microbiologists responsible for provision of diagnostic services and advice to front-line clinicians. While most hospitals had consultant-led microbiology departments, infectious iiseases departments were based in a small number of specialist centres. The demand for infection expertise is growing in the NHS, driven by advances in medical care, increasing awareness of the impact of antibiotic resistant and healthcare associated infections and threats from emerging infectious diseases. At the same time diagnostic services are being reorganised into pathology networks. The Combined Infection Training (CIT) is delivering a consultant workforce with expertise both in laboratory diagnostic practice and delivery of direct patient care. These changes create challenges for delivery of high quality infection expertise equitably across the NHS. They also offer an opportunity to shape infection services to meet clinical and laboratory demands. To date there has not been an attempt to bring together a single set of best practice guidelines for the requirements of an infection service. This document sets out seven standards. These are written to be practical and flexible according to the diverse ways in which infection expertise may be required across the NHS. It has been prepared by the Clinical Services Committee of the British Infection Association drawing on published evidence and guidance where they exist and on the group's extensive experience of delivering infection services in hospitals across the NHS. It was then refined with input from the RCP Joint Specialist committee (JSC) and the RCPath Specialist Advisory Committee (SAC) and through consultation with the RCPath membership. It has been endorsed by the Royal College of Pathologists and the Royal College of Physicians. It will be reviewed annually by the CSC and updated as additional evidence becomes available.

Indexed as

Infection serviceInfectious diseasesMicrobiologyStandardsVirology

Identifiers

PMID36338177
PMCPMC9623038
OpenAlexW3198176756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.