ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Diet-induced microbial adaptation process of red deer (
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adaptive changes in the intestinal microbiota of giant pandas following reintroduction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Microbial-Short-Chain Fatty Acids-Epithelial Transport Axis in the Rumen Ecosystem Between Tarim Wapiti (Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Variations in Intestinal Microbiota Among Three Species in the Cervidae Family Under the Same Feeding Conditions.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Response of the gut microbiota to changes in the nutritional status of red deer during winter.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The gut microbial differences between pre-released and wild red deer: Firmicutes abundance may affect wild adaptation after release.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Alterations in Fecal Microbiota Linked to Environment and Sex in Red Deer (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insufficient prey density is a major factor hindering the recovery of the Amur tiger (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.