Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338015›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2022

Waiting time in the premilking holding pen and subsequent lying and walking behaviors of Holstein cows.

D Manríquez, S Zúñiga, S Paudyal, G Solano, P J Pinedo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D ManríquezDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1171.
S ZúñigaDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1171.
S PaudyalDepartment of Animal Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.
G SolanoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1171.
P J PinedoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1171.
Colorado State University · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of waiting time (WT) in the premilking holding pen on the subsequent lying and walking behaviors of Holstein cows. A total of 108 cows (multiparous n = 95; primiparous n = 13), milked 3 times/d [AM (0700 h), PM (1500 h), and nighttime (2300 h)] were monitored for individual WT, which was defined as the time elapsed between the entrance of the first cow to the milking stall in a rotary milking system and the entrance of each subsequent cow housed in the same milking pen. Data for lying time (min), standing time (min), lying bouts (no.), and walking behavior (no. of steps) in 15-min intervals were collected using a commercial 3-dimensional accelerometer affixed on the hind left leg of each cow from early to mid lactation. Mean values (min/h, no./h) for each behavior calculated between consecutive milkings were compared among 3 WT categories: cows with WT ≤30 min (WT1), WT 30 to 60 min (WT2), and WT >60 min (WT3). The overall mean (SD) of WT during the study period was 31.2 (23.4) min, and the distribution of WT1, WT2, and WT3 in all cows through the monitoring period was 50.9, 43.3, and 5.7%, respectively. No significant effects were established for overall WT on any of the behaviors under analysis. However, subsequent analysis by milking shift indicated that, during the period following the night milking, cows in WT1 exhibited the shortest lying time, whereas cows in WT3 had the greatest number of lying bouts. No effect of WT category was observed on the number of steps after any of the milking shifts. Results of this study indicate a moderate effect of WT on lying behavior after the nighttime milking. Variables such as temperature-humidity index, parity, and time of day affected cow behavior and should be considered when evaluating the impact of routine management practices, such as milking, on commercial farms.

Identifiers

PMID36338015
PMCPMC9623775
OpenAlexW4224871215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.