Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36337847›Full record

ArticleTranslational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine2022

Individual- and Environmental- Level Predictors of Recess Activity and Sedentary Behavior: Findings from the I-CAN! study.

John B Bartholomew, Jon Clutton, Katie Burford, Eivind Aadland, Geir Kare Resaland, Esbelle M Jowers, Vanessa Errisuiz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John B BartholomewDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Jon CluttonDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Katie BurfordDepartment of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Austin, TX, USA.
Eivind AadlandDepartment of Sport, Food, and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sognfdal, Norway.
Geir Kare ResalandCenter for Physically Active Learning, Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sognfdal, Norway.
Esbelle M JowersDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Vanessa ErrisuizDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USVestlandsforsking · NOWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

Building the Evidence Base for Physically Active Lessons in Elementary SchoolsR01HD070741 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BARTHOLOMEW, JOHN B. · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD070741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose: Recess represents a prime opportunity for physical activity during the school day. However, evidence is mixed with regard to factors associated with activity during recess. Methods: Data were collected as a part of the Texas Initiative for Children's Activity and Nutrition (I-CAN!) program from 14 elementary schools and 1,049 4 Results: At the student-level, boys were more active than girls (effect size (ES)=0.50) and percent time in MVPA was directly associated with aerobic fitness (ES=0.35). At the school-level, recess infrastructure was associated with percent time in MVPA (ES=1.45), except for factors related to sedentary behavior, which were indirectly associated with percent time in MVPA (ES=-1.98). Patterns for sedentary behavior mirrored these effects. Conclusions: This is one of the few studies to test the associations of fitness and sedentary upgrades to play areas with MVPA and sedentary behavior. The results suggest that recess is most likely to support MVPA in boys and those who are already most fit (i.e., those who would not be the target of intervention). This is not surprising because the focus of recess is on free choice of play, and thus recess might be supported more for social and emotional benefits than the impact on physical activity.

Indexed as

ChildrenElementary schoolModerate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)Physical activityRecess

Identifiers

PMID36337847
PMCPMC9635332
OpenAlexW4296878154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.