ArticleCureus2022
Modified WHO Partograph in Labour Room: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Find Out Concerns, Challenges and Solutions.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Every day many women die in pregnancy and childbirth, most of which are preventable. Regular and timely labour monitoring by partograph is of utmost importance. The aim of this study was to increase partograph use by residents in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in all eligible women from existing 25% to 90% over six months through a quality improvement (QI) process. A team of six members including consultants, residents, and staff nurses did a root cause analysis through fishbone analysis to identify why the rate of use of partograph is only 25% of all cases. Many strategies were implemented through Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles for the cause identified. The interventions were allocation of triage area for timely identification of eligible women in the active phase of labour, training of residents, involving interns and nurses for use in shortage of staff, making departmental written policy, and assigning checking authority, to shift patients with attached partograph only; partograph has to be attached in the file right from the beginning when sisters make women admission file. These were done in five PDSA cycles and the outcome was measured by a control chart. The rate of partograph use increased from 25% to 92% over the study period of six months from September 2020 to February 2021. Regular audits were conducted to maintain the results. It can thus be concluded that partograph appears easy to implement and inexpensive, but its use still has enormous difficulties. But a QI approach can help in improving adherence to partograph use, by solving the root cause of the concern and challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.