Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36337759›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2021

Ontario COVID-19 assessment centre practices in patient counselling, education, and follow-up care: A provincial survey.

Helen Genis, Scott MacPhee, Nancy Vandenbergh, Chris Yu, Nisha Andany, Adrienne K Chan, Nick Daneman, Philip W Lam

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Describing the Role of a COVID Assessment Centre During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helen GenisDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Scott MacPheeSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nancy VandenberghSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chris YuSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nisha AndanyDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adrienne K ChanDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nick DanemanDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Philip W LamDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Health Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In March 2020, COVID-19 assessment centres were launched across the province of Ontario to facilitate COVID-19 testing outside of emergency departments. We aimed to study the degree to which assessment centres provide education and follow-up care for patients with suspected COVID-19. Methods: We conducted an online survey of Ontario COVID-19 assessment centre directors between September 15 and October 15, 2020. The primary outcomes studied were the types of educational modalities employed and information conveyed, methods and frequency of test result communication, and any follow-up care that was offered. Survey respondents were also asked to provide descriptions of barriers to patient education and test communication. Results: A total of 56 directors (representing 73 assessment centres) completed the survey. The most frequent educational modalities employed were educational handouts (92%), direct in-person counselling (89%), and referral to website (72%). Seventy-one percent of respondents indicated patients with positive test results would be notified, and 61% of respondents indicated that follow-up care would be offered. The most frequently reported barriers to patient education were insufficient time and high volume of tests, while the most frequently reported barriers to communication of test results were difficulty accessing online health portals and high volume of tests. Conclusion: The ability of many assessment centres to provide patient education is limited by both individual patient and system-level factors. Assessment centres may benefit from standardization of educational materials, improved accessibility to test results for patients in marginalized groups, and virtual pathways to facilitate additional counselling and care for individuals who test positive.

Indexed as

assessment centrecoronavirusCOVID-19

Identifiers

PMID36337759
PMCPMC9615467
OpenAlexW3180228081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.