Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36337726›Full record

ArticleEthos (Berkeley, Calif.)2022

A Critical Discourse Analysis of an Australian Incarcerated Trans Woman's Letters of Complaint and Self-Advocacy.

Sherree D Halliwell, Carol du Plessis, Andrew Hickey, Jessica Gildersleeve, Amy B Mullens, Tait Sanders, Kirsty A Clark, Jaclyn M W Hughto, Joseph Debattista, Tania M Phillips and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethos (Berkeley, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Transformative trans incarceration research: now and into the future.International journal of transgender health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sherree D HalliwellSchool of Creative Arts at the University of Southern Queensland.ORCID 0000-0002-1307-1794
Carol du PlessisSchool of Psychology and Wellbeing at the University of Southern Queensland.
Andrew HickeyCommunications in the School of Humanities and Communication and Chair of the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Southern Queensland.
Jessica GildersleeveEnglish literature at the University of Southern Queensland.
Amy B MullensSchool of Psychology and Wellbeing at the University of Southern Queensland.
Tait SandersSchool of Psychology and Wellbeing at the University of Southern Queensland.
Kirsty A ClarkDepartment of Medicine, Health, and Society and Program in Public Policy Studies.
Jaclyn M W HughtoBrown School of Public Health and faculty in the Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity at Brown University.
Joseph Debattista(Metro North Health) based at the Metro North Public Health Unit.
Tania M PhillipsSchool of Psychology and Wellbeing at the University of Southern Queensland.
Kirstie DakenCentre for Health Research, Institute of Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland.
Annette BrömdalSchool of Education.

Funding

NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD012898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case study provides a critical discourse analysis of 121 letters of complaint and self-advocacy authored by Natasha Keating, a trans woman incarcerated in two Australian male correctional facilities from 2000 to 2007. During her incarceration, Natasha experienced victimization, misgendering, microaggression, and institutional discrimination. Despite this, Natasha embodied and "fought" against the injustices she experienced, whilst seeking to speak for other trans incarcerated persons also silenced and treated with indifference, contributing to changes in the carceral system. This original case study analyzes the discursive strategies Natasha employed to construct and reclaim an affirming self-identity through a deliberate campaign to effect social change and policy concessions within a system designed to curtail self-determination. Through her empathic and impassioned letter-writing approach, leveraging a

Identifiers

PMID36337726
PMCPMC9632636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.