ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Autologous Fat Grafting: Evaluation of Efficacy in Pain Relief.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Guideline
- The Efficacy of Fat Grafting on Treating Post-Mastectomy Pain with and without Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous fat grafting (AFG) has been used in reconstructive plastic surgery for over a century. Although it has obvious benefits to the aesthetic appearance of many reconstructive surgeries, less appreciated advantages of fat grafting have also been shown in potential pain reduction. This can be seen across the board from head to toe with examples ranging from facial nerve injury to pedal atrophy and foot ulcers. The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the efficacy of AFG for pain relief in various indications and serve as a reference for clinicians to gain insight on potentially beneficial therapies for their patients. Methods: A broad literature review was performed to analyze the various uses of AFG for pain management by various indications including postmastectomy pain syndrome, scar pain, neuromas, chronic wounds and many more. The PubMed, Science Direct and Scopus online databases were searched using keywords such as "autologous fat grafting," "reconstruction," "pain," and "therapy." Results: At this point, there is decent evidence to support AFG's role in pain resolution in postmastectomy pain syndrome, neuropathic scar pain, and pedal injury. There is also ample low-level evidence for pain efficacy in autoimmune diseases, neuromas, vulvar lichen sclerosis, burns, and radiation-induced wounds. Conclusions: While there is a clear lack of higher-level evidence based studies conducted on AFG for all indications, the existing literature shows a definite trend of reconstructive efficacy and pain management that can be clearly appreciated. With the increasing popularity of this procedure for reconstruction, higher-level studies are beginning to take place pertaining to AFG's efficacy not only in reconstruction, but pain management as well.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.