Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36337390›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Validation of translated Obstetric Quality of Recovery (ObsQoR-10A) score after nonelective cesarean delivery (CD) in an Arabic-speaking population.

Shumaila Mukarram, Shoukat Ali, Muhammad Zulqurnain, Ibtihal A M Alkadi, Abdulelah I Alhatlan, Mohammed Z H Abbasi, Muhammad Q Mushtaq, Ahmed Y AbuHammad, Khalida Shahid, Asghar Waqas and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shumaila MukarramDepartment of Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Shoukat AliDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad ZulqurnainDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Ibtihal A M AlkadiDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulelah I AlhatlanDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Z H AbbasiDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad Q MushtaqDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Y AbuHammadDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Khalida ShahidDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Asghar WaqasDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS); and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Atif ShafqatDepartment of Anesthesiology, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS); and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The ObsQoR-11 is a validated scale that assesses recovery after cesarean delivery (CD). This observational study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of its Arabic version. Methods: The original ObsQoR-11 was translated into an Arabic version (ObsQoR-10A). All participants completed the ObsQoR-10A at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively after CD. Validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility were assessed. Results: The ObsQoR-10A correlated with Global Health Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 24 h ( Conclusions: ObsQoR-10A is a valid, reliable, responsive, and a clinically feasible tool in an Arabic-speaking obstetric population.

Indexed as

Cesarean deliveryObsQoRpatient-reported outcome measurepostoperativequality of recover

Identifiers

PMID36337390
PMCPMC9630706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.