ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Implementation and Evaluation of a Dynamic Neck Brace Rehabilitation Device Prototype.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative Traction for Pediatric Spinal Deformity Correction: A Technical Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- A Novel Single-Loop Mechanism for Neck Rehabilitation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Design and Validation of a Novel Robotic Neck Brace for Cervical Traction.IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics : a joint publication of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society and the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rehabilitation assistive devices for head/neck pain treatment cannot allow dynamic changes in position and orientation of the head/neck. Moreover, such devices can neither be used simultaneously nor can they assess the patients' head/neck conditions. This paper aims at designing and implementing a novel dynamic head/neck brace that provides static and dynamic support and/or traction at symmetric and asymmetric positions. This device also provides assessments of the head/neck stiffness for the purpose of fulfilling diagnoses of the head/neck disorders. The device was used and evaluated for its range of motion and its symmetric traction capability using two control modalities. In addition, it was also evaluated in determining the stiffness of the head/neck throughout a simulating mechanical model involved in a set of springs. The device could apply right/left lateral bending to the head/neck ranged -6.97 ± 0.01° to 7.02 ± 0.01° with accuracies of 99.89% and 99.48%, and flexion/extension ranged -8.10 ± 0.02° to 8.12 ± 0.01° with accuracies of 99.57% and 99.42%, respectively, throughout a traction phase of 20 mm. The practical measurements through the symmetric traction tests showed some deviations as compared to that being calculated. Such deviations were greater in flexion/extension rather than the right/left lateral bending. The mean of the obtained error was less than 0.34° for all situations of tests. The accuracies of stiffness measurement of the mechanical model were 99.78% and 99.96%, respectively, throughout performing stair and step tests. The paper presented a novel design of a dynamic head/neck brace that provides support and/or traction to any head/neck positions and capable of evaluating the head/neck stiffness during cervical traction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.