ArticleJDS communications2021
Selection and drift reduce genetic variation for milk yield in Manech Tête Rousse dairy sheep.
Article in JDS communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Restructuring breeding programs 1: Integration of diversity.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Genetic variation of the POU1F1 gene and its association with body weight in indonesian local chickens.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Estimation of heritabilities and genetic correlations by time slices using predictivity in large genomic models.Genetics · 2025Article
- Temporal dynamics of genetic parameters and SNP effects for performance and disorder traits in poultry undergoing genomic selection.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Genetic Variance Estimation over Time in Broiler Breeding Programmes for Growth and Reproductive Traits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- The Role of Reproduction and Genetic Variation in Polish White-Backed Cows in the Breed Restoration Process.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Assessment of long-term trends in genetic mean and variance after the introduction of genomic selection in layers: a simulation study.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- An observational study of growth rate and body weight variance partition for United Kingdom dairy calves from birth to 20 weeks of age.JDS communications · 2021Article
- Investigating the persistence of accuracy of genomic predictions over time in broilers.Journal of animal science · 2021Article
- Emerging issues in genomic selection.Journal of animal science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decreases in genetic variance over generations reduce future genetic gain. We studied the evolution of genetic variance in the dairy sheep breed Manech Tête Rousse, which has been selected for increasingly complex objectives, including, in this order, milk yield, milk contents, scrapie resistance, and somatic cell score. We estimated base population genetic variance and genetic variance by sex and per year of birth from 1981 to 2014. The data consisted of 1,842,295 milk yield records (from 1978 to 2017) and a pedigree including 530,572 females (96% of them with records) and 3,798 artificial insemination males. As a measure of drift, we computed average relationships for each cohort from which we derived expected reduction of variance due to increased relationships. The difference between observed and expected reductions in genetic variances is the reduction in genetic variance due to selection. Average relationships increased steadily but slowly in both sexes. For females, genetic variance reduced with time until a plateau was reached at around 90% of the initial genetic variance. The reduction due to relationships (roughly 3% cumulated in 30 yr) was smaller than that due to selection (roughly 10% across the last years). A smaller loss due to selection was seen in recent years, possibly due to a change in selection objectives. These results agree well with theoretical expectations. The pattern of the evolution of genetic variance in males was similar to that for females but with a stronger reduction because of strong selection of AI males at birth. We conclude that the reductions in genetic variation due to selection and drift agree with expectations, and none of the reductions are very strong in this population because of control of inbreeding and smooth changes in selection objectives over time.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.