ArticleStatistics & probability letters2022
Identification of the outcome distribution and sensitivity analysis under weak confounder-instrument interaction.
Article in Statistics & probability letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Statistical inference for time-to-event data in non-randomized cohorts with selective attrition.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, Wang and Tchetgen Tchetgen (2018) showed that the global average treatment effect is identifiable even in the presence of unmeasured confounders so long as they do not modify the instrument's additive effect on the treatment. We use a simple and direct method to show that this no-interaction assumption allows identification of the entire outcome distribution, which leads to multiply robust estimation procedures for nonlinear functionals like the quantile and Mann-Whitney treatment effects. Similarly, we can bound these causal estimands through the outcome distribution in sensitivity analysis against confounder-instrument interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.