ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2022
Inter-examiner reliability in identifying lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy by lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy index, a novel parameter.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Association of Preoperative Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Muscle Atrophy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To evaluate the inter-examiner reliability of our novel parameter, the lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy index, in identifying the lumbar paravertebral muscle atrophy. [Participants and Methods] The study group consisted of 225 adults, with a mean age of 64.7 (range, 21-89) years, who underwent posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative spinal disease at our hospital between July 2013 and June 2017. Preoperative axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images were used to evaluate the lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy index and observe the presence or absence of severe lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy. The lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy index was calculated at each intervertebral level, from L1-2 through L4-5, once by two examiners, and the Cohen's kappa statistic was used to calculate the inter-examiner agreement of the classification of the presence or absence of atrophy at each level. [Results] The agreement was high (kappa, 0.79-0.88) for the lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy index at all levels, except at the L3-4 level (kappa, 0.49). The lower kappa statistic at L3-4 likely reflects the unique morphological characteristics at this level. [Conclusion] The lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy index is a new, simple, easy-to-use, and sufficiently reliable parameter to identify lumbar paraspinal atrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.