ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2022
Relationship between hand-behind-back motion and internal rotation with the shoulder in extension.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of shoulder internal rotation exercise with electromyographic and ultrasonographic biofeedback in patients with painful and restricted hand-behind-back motion: a randomized-controlled trial.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the extent of shoulder internal rotation measured in the extended position of the shoulder could be a good indicator of hand-behind-back motion ability. [Participants and Methods] We measured internal rotation with the shoulder in extension in 26 healthy adults (average age, 25.2 ± 2.5 years). Internal rotation was measured passively in the supine position at 30° of shoulder extension. Additionally, a hand-behind-back motion was performed, and the hand-behind-back distance was measured. The relationship between the angle of internal rotation with the shoulder in extension and hand-behind-back distance was evaluated using Pearson's product-moment correlation. The level of significance was set at 5%. [Results] The angle of internal rotation with the shoulder in extension and the hand-behind-back distance correlate significantly. [Conclusion] Internal rotation with the shoulder in extension is a good indicator of hand-behind-back motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.