ArticleJDS communications2021
Genomic evaluations using data recorded on smallholder dairy farms in low- to middle-income countries.
Article in JDS communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing genetic evaluation of milk yield and composition using a genomic-polygenic model in smallholder dairy cattle farms in Thailand.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Article
- Spatial modelling improves genomic evaluation in Tanzanian smallholder admixed dairy cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Accurate determination of breed origin of alleles in a simulated smallholder crossbred dairy cattle population.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- The genetic structure and diversity of smallholder dairy cattle in Rwanda.BMC genomic data · 2025Article
- Evaluation of crossbreeding strategies for improved adaptation and productivity in African smallholder cattle farms.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- On the ability of the LR method to detect bias when there is pedigree misspecification and lack of connectedness.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Developing flexible models for genetic evaluations in smallholder crossbred dairy farms.Journal of dairy science · 2023Article
- Genomic evaluation of milk yield in a smallholder crossbred dairy production system in India.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Spatial modelling improves genetic evaluation in smallholder breeding programs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breeding has increased genetic gain for dairy cattle in advanced economies but has had limited success in improving dairy cattle in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC). Genetic evaluations are a central component of delivering genetic gain, because they separate the genetic and environmental effects of animals' phenotypes. Genetic evaluations have been successful in advanced economies because of large data sets and strong genetic connectedness, provided by the widespread use of artificial insemination (AI) and accurate recording of pedigree information. In smallholder dairy production systems of many LMICs, the limited use of AI and small herd sizes results in a data structure with insufficient genetic connectedness between herds to facilitate genetic evaluations based on pedigree. Genomic information keeps track of shared haplotypes rather than shared relatives captured by pedigree records. Therefore, genomic information could capture "hidden" genetic relationships, that are not captured by pedigree information, to strengthen genetic connectedness in LMIC smallholder dairy data sets. This study's objective was to use simulation to quantify the power of genomic information to enable genetic evaluation using LMIC smallholder dairy data sets. The results from this study show that (1) genetic evaluations using genomic information were more accurate than those using pedigree information in populations with a high effective population size and weak genetic connectedness; and (2) genetic evaluations modeling herd as a random effect had higher or equal accuracy than those modeling herd as a fixed effect. This demonstrates the potential of genomic information to be an enabling technology in LMIC smallholder dairy production systems by facilitating genetic evaluations with in situ records collected from herds of ≤4 cows. The establishment of routine genomic evaluations could allow the development of LMIC breeding programs comprising an informal set of nucleus animals distributed across many small herds within the target environment. These nucleus animals could be used for genetic evaluation, and the best animals could be disseminated to participating smallholder dairy farms. Together, this could increase the productivity, profitability, and sustainability of LMIC smallholder dairy production systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.