Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36337118›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2021

Genomic evaluations using data recorded on smallholder dairy farms in low- to middle-income countries.

Owen Powell, Raphael Mrode, R Chris Gaynor, Martin Johnsson, Gregor Gorjanc, John M Hickey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Owen PowellThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Raphael MrodeScotland's Rural College (SRUC), Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
R Chris GaynorThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Martin JohnssonThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Gregor GorjancThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
John M HickeyThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breeding has increased genetic gain for dairy cattle in advanced economies but has had limited success in improving dairy cattle in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC). Genetic evaluations are a central component of delivering genetic gain, because they separate the genetic and environmental effects of animals' phenotypes. Genetic evaluations have been successful in advanced economies because of large data sets and strong genetic connectedness, provided by the widespread use of artificial insemination (AI) and accurate recording of pedigree information. In smallholder dairy production systems of many LMICs, the limited use of AI and small herd sizes results in a data structure with insufficient genetic connectedness between herds to facilitate genetic evaluations based on pedigree. Genomic information keeps track of shared haplotypes rather than shared relatives captured by pedigree records. Therefore, genomic information could capture "hidden" genetic relationships, that are not captured by pedigree information, to strengthen genetic connectedness in LMIC smallholder dairy data sets. This study's objective was to use simulation to quantify the power of genomic information to enable genetic evaluation using LMIC smallholder dairy data sets. The results from this study show that (1) genetic evaluations using genomic information were more accurate than those using pedigree information in populations with a high effective population size and weak genetic connectedness; and (2) genetic evaluations modeling herd as a random effect had higher or equal accuracy than those modeling herd as a fixed effect. This demonstrates the potential of genomic information to be an enabling technology in LMIC smallholder dairy production systems by facilitating genetic evaluations with in situ records collected from herds of ≤4 cows. The establishment of routine genomic evaluations could allow the development of LMIC breeding programs comprising an informal set of nucleus animals distributed across many small herds within the target environment. These nucleus animals could be used for genetic evaluation, and the best animals could be disseminated to participating smallholder dairy farms. Together, this could increase the productivity, profitability, and sustainability of LMIC smallholder dairy production systems.

Identifiers

PMID36337118
PMCPMC9623656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.