Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36337034›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal2023

Cardiac troponin release following coronary artery bypass grafting: mechanisms and clinical implications.

Samuel Heuts, Can Gollmann-Tepeköylü, Ellen J S Denessen, Jules R Olsthoorn, Jamie L R Romeo, Jos G Maessen, Arnoud W J van 't Hof, Otto Bekers, Ola Hammarsten, Leo Pölzl and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction: Do We Need an Updated Definition?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Current Clinical Practices and Future Perspectives.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Samuel HeutsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3531-9997
Can Gollmann-TepeköylüDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ellen J S DenessenCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jules R OlsthoornDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jamie L R RomeoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jos G MaessenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Arnoud W J van 't HofCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Otto BekersCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ola HammarstenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Leo PölzlDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6552-8899
Johannes HolfeldDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6623-0595
Nikolaos BonarosDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Iwan C C van der HorstCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sean M DavidsonThe Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Matthias ThielmannDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1007-2871
Alma M A MingelsCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4648-5053
Maastricht University · NLInnsbruck Medical University · ATRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity College London · GBWest German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DE

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/18/44/33790British Heart Foundation PG/21/10798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of biomarkers is undisputed in the diagnosis of primary myocardial infarction (MI), but their value for identifying MI is less well studied in the postoperative phase following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). To identify patients with periprocedural MI (PMI), several conflicting definitions of PMI have been proposed, relying either on cardiac troponin (cTn) or the MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase, with or without supporting evidence of ischaemia. However, CABG inherently induces the release of cardiac biomarkers, as reflected by significant cTn concentrations in patients with uncomplicated postoperative courses. Still, the underlying (patho)physiological release mechanisms of cTn are incompletely understood, complicating adequate interpretation of postoperative increases in cTn concentrations. Therefore, the aim of the current review is to present these potential underlying mechanisms of cTn release in general, and following CABG in particular (Graphical Abstract). Based on these mechanisms, dissimilarities in the release of cTnI and cTnT are discussed, with potentially important implications for clinical practice. Consequently, currently proposed cTn biomarker cut-offs by the prevailing definitions of PMI might warrant re-assessment, with differentiation in cut-offs for the separate available assays and surgical strategies. To resolve these issues, future prospective studies are warranted to determine the prognostic influence of biomarker release in general and PMI in particular.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassMyocardial InfarctionBiomarkersHumansTroponin ITroponin TBiomarkersTroponin ITroponin TCardiac surgeryCardiac troponinCoronary artery bypass graftingMyocardial infarctionPeriprocedural myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID36337034
PMCPMC9897191
OpenAlexW4308370545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.