Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36336963›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2023

Clinical outcomes of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus imatinib in older patients with CML.

Takaaki Ono, Naoto Takahashi, Masahiro Kizaki, Tatsuya Kawaguchi, Ritsuro Suzuki, Kazuhito Yamamoto, Kazunori Ohnishi, Tomoki Naoe, Itaru Matsumura

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CLINICAL VALIDATION OF ANKRD36 MUTATIONS AS A NOVEL BIOMARKER FOR MONITORING EARLY PROGRESSION AND TIMELY CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN BLAST CRISIS CML.Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Takaaki OnoDepartment of Transfusion and Cell Therapy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3922-7432
Naoto TakahashiDepartment of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6758-3787
Masahiro KizakiDepartment of Hematology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Japan.
Tatsuya KawaguchiDepartment of Medical Technology, Kumamoto Health Science University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Ritsuro SuzukiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5974-7614
Kazuhito YamamotoDepartment of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-8955
Kazunori OhnishiShubun University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Ichinomiya, Japan.
Tomoki NaoeNational Hospital Organization, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Itaru MatsumuraDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2818-4270
Aichi Cancer Center · JPAkita University · JPHamamatsu University · JPKindai University Hospital · JPKumamoto Health Science University · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPShimane University · JPShubun University · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age and comorbidities are important factors to be considered in the selection of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for first-line treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). However, it is yet unclear whether TKI selection, particularly, imatinib versus second-generation TKIs (2GTKIs), impacts treatment outcomes in the clinical practice. To address this, we compared the clinical outcomes of prospectively registered 452 patients with CML-CP treated with imatinib and 2GTKIs, taking into consideration their age and/or comorbidities. A total of 136 patients (30.1%) were classified into an older cohort (≥65 years) and 316 (69.9%) into a younger cohort (18-64 years). The TKI selection did not vary based on age (70.6% received 2GTKIs in the younger cohort and 66.2% in the older cohort). The median follow-up period was 5.4 years. Treatment responses including the cumulative incidence of deep molecular response (BCR-ABL1 international scale ≤0.0032%) at any time were similar between the two age cohorts regardless of the type of TKI. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the older cohort was lower than that in the younger cohort (95.9% vs 83.8%; p < 0.0001), whereas the 5-year OS in patients treated with 2GTKIs was not influenced by age factors and comorbidities. Therefore, our results suggest that the selection of 2GTKIs as first-line treatment is an effective option for both younger and older CML-CP patients with or without comorbidities. This trial was registered at UMIN-CTR as 00003581.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsAgedFusion Proteins, bcr-ablHumansImatinib MesylateProtein Kinase InhibitorsFusion Proteins, bcr-ablImatinib MesylateProtein Kinase InhibitorsTyrosine Kinase Inhibitorschronic myeloid leukemiacomorbidityimatinibolder patientssecond-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36336963
PMCPMC9986084
OpenAlexW4308366518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.