Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36336875›Full record

ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2022

Tricky TRIC: A replication study using trophoblast retrieval and isolation from the cervix to study genetic birth defects.

Marie van Dijk, Souad Boussata, Dianta Janssen, Gijs Afink, Jiska Jebbink, Merel van Maarle, Esther Wortelboer, Angelique Kooper, Eva Pajkrt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie van DijkReproductive Biology Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1461-3441
Souad BoussataReproductive Biology Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dianta JanssenReproductive Biology Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gijs AfinkReproductive Biology Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jiska JebbinkObstetrics & Gynaecology, OLVG Location Oost, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Merel van MaarleAmsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Esther WortelboerAmsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Angelique KooperAmsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva PajkrtAmsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLGGZ Oost Brabant · NL

Funding

Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNoninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis has recently been introduced for a limited number of monogenetic disorders. However, the majority of DNA diagnostics still require fetal material obtained using an invasive test. Recently, a novel technique, TRIC (Trophoblast Retrieval and Isolation from the Cervix), has been described, which collects fetal trophoblast cells by endocervical sampling. Since this technique has not been successfully replicated by other groups, we aimed to achieve this in the current study.

methodPregnant women referred for transvaginal chorionic villous sampling (CVS) were asked for an endocervical sample prior to CVS. The TRIC samples were processed to isolate trophoblast DNA. TRIC DNA was used in ForenSeq to determine the amount of maternal DNA contamination, and for Sanger sequencing in case of a monogenic disorder.

results23%-44% of samples had a sufficiently high fetal DNA fraction to allow genetic testing, as calculated by Sanger sequencing and ForenSeq, respectively.

conclusionWe have been able to successfully replicate the TRIC protocol, although with a much lower success rate as described by the original study performing TRIC. As we obtained the samples in the actual clinical setting envisioned, the method in its current setup is not advisable for use in prenatal diagnostics.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriTrophoblastsChorionic Villi SamplingFemaleGenetic TestingHumansPregnancyPrenatal Diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID36336875
PMCPMC10098821
OpenAlexW4308371146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.