Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36336822›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Being wheelchair-bound and being bedridden: Two concept analyses.

Johannes Schirghuber, Berta Schrems

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johannes SchirghuberDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8645-3806
Berta SchremsDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2036-7091
University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAnalysis of the concepts and development of a conceptual definition of being wheelchair-bound and being bedridden.

designConcept analysis.

methodsWalker and Avant´s concept analysis method was used. A thematic analysis guided the determination of the attributes, antecedents and consequences.

resultsBeing wheelchair-bound and being bedridden are defined as permanent states in which people are bound to an object. Being passively bound to a wheelchair and being bedridden both mean an increasing restriction of the life-space. Being passive wheelchair-bound often represents a preliminary stage to being bedridden. Both concepts have six attributes: in need of help, powerlessness, life-space confinement, mobility limitation, endurance and weakness. They differ in the main feature maintaining an independent sitting position. Physical immobility and physiological instability are antecedents with the following influencing factors: illness, complexity, burden, endogenous/exogenous booster. The consequences are the progression of inactivity and all related physical and psycho-social problems.

Indexed as

FrailtyWheelchairsHumansMobility LimitationNutritional Statusbedboundbedriddenboundednessconcept analysiswheelchair-bound

Identifiers

PMID36336822
PMCPMC10006658
OpenAlexW4308320643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.