Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36336771›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2023

Artificial Intelligence for Pre-operative Diagnosis of Malignant Thyroid Nodules Based on Sonographic Features and Cytology Category.

Karishma Jassal, Afsanesh Koohestani, Andrew Kiu, April Strong, Nandhini Ravintharan, Meei Yeung, Simon Grodski, Jonathan W Serpell, James C Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karishma JassalMonash University Endocrine Surgery Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia. Karishma.Jassal@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0379-6476
Afsanesh KoohestaniMonash University Endocrine Surgery Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Andrew KiuDepartment of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
April StrongDepartment of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Nandhini RavintharanDepartment of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Meei YeungMonash University Endocrine Surgery Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Simon GrodskiMonash University Endocrine Surgery Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Jonathan W SerpellMonash University Endocrine Surgery Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
James C LeeMonash University Endocrine Surgery Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent diagnosis and classification of thyroid nodules are susceptible to subjective factors. Despite widespread use of ultrasonography (USG) and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) to assess thyroid nodules, the interpretation of results is nuanced and requires specialist endocrine surgery input. Using readily available pre-operative data, the aims of this study were to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models to classify nodules into likely benign or malignant and to compare the diagnostic performance of the models.

methodsPatients undergoing surgery for thyroid nodules between 2010 and 2020 were recruited from our institution's database into training and testing groups. Demographics, serum TSH level, cytology, ultrasonography features and histopathology data were extracted. The training group USG images were re-reviewed by a study radiologist experienced in thyroid USG, who reported the relevant features and supplemented with data extracted from existing reports to reduce sampling bias. Testing group USG features were extracted solely from existing reports to reflect real-life practice of a non-thyroid specialist. We developed four AI models based on classification algorithms (k-Nearest Neighbour, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes) and evaluated their diagnostic performance of thyroid malignancy.

resultsIn the training group (n = 857), 75% were female and 27% of cases were malignant. The testing group (n = 198) consisted of 77% females and 17% malignant cases. Mean age was 54.7 ± 16.2 years for the training group and 50.1 ± 17.4 years for the testing group. Following validation with the testing group, support vector machine classifier was found to perform best in predicting final histopathology with an accuracy of 89%, sensitivity 89%, specificity 83%, F-score 94% and AUROC 0.86.

conclusionWe have developed a first of its kind, pilot AI model that can accurately predict malignancy in thyroid nodules using USG features, FNAC, demographics and serum TSH. There is potential for a model like this to be used as a decision support tool in under-resourced areas as well as by non-thyroid specialists.

Indexed as

Thyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleAdultAgedArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityThyrotropinUltrasonographyThyrotropin

Identifiers

PMID36336771
PMCPMC9803749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.