Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36336757›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2023

White matter predicts tDCS antidepressant effects in a sham-controlled clinical trial study.

Tamires A Zanao, Matthias S Luethi, Stephan Goerigk, Paulo Suen, Alexandre P Diaz, Jair C Soares, Andre R Brunoni

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A review of diffusion MRI in mood disorders: mechanisms and predictors of treatment response.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tamires A ZanaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Matthias S LuethiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Stephan GoerigkDepartment and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Laboratory of Neurosciences LIM-27), São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo SuenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre P DiazHochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.
Jair C SoaresHochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.
Andre R BrunoniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. brunowsky@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6310-3571

Funding

FAPESP 2012/20911-5FAPESP 2020/03235-2FAPESP 2021/10574-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used as treatment for depression, but its effects are heterogeneous. We investigated, in a subsample of the clinical trial Escitalopram versus Electrical Direct Current Therapy for Depression Study (ELECTTDCS), whether white matter areas associated with depression disorder were associated with tDCS response. Baseline diffusion tensor imaging data were analyzed from 49 patients (34 females, mean age 41.9) randomized to escitalopram 20 mg/day, tDCS (2 mA, 30 min, 22 sessions), or placebo. Antidepressant outcomes were assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS) after 10-week treatment. We used whole-brain tractography for extracting white matter measures for anterior corpus callosum, and bilaterally for cingulum bundle, striato-frontal, inferior occipito-frontal fasciculus and uncinate. For the rostral body, tDCS group showed higher MD associated with antidepressant effects (estimate = -5.13 ± 1.64, p = 0.002), and tDCS significantly differed from the placebo and the escitalopram group. The left striato-frontal tract showed higher FA associated with antidepressant effects (estimate = -2.14 ± 0.72, p = 0.003), and tDCS differed only from the placebo group. For the right uncinate, the tDCS group lower AD values were associated with higher HDRS decrease (estimate = -1.45 ± 0.67, p = 0.031). Abnormalities in white matter MDD-related areas are associated with tDCS antidepressant effects. Suggested better white matter microstructure of the left prefrontal cortex was associated with tDCS antidepressant effects. Future studies should investigate whether these findings are driven by electric field diffusion and density in these areas.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderTranscranial Direct Current StimulationWhite MatterAdultAntidepressive AgentsDiffusion Tensor ImagingDouble-Blind MethodEscitalopramFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsEscitalopramAntidepressant responseDiffusion tensor imagingMagnetic resonance imagingMajor depressive disorderNoninvasive brain stimulationTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.