Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36336714›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2023

Genetic prediction of male pattern baldness based on large independent datasets.

Yan Chen, Pirro Hysi, Carlo Maj, Stefanie Heilmann-Heimbach, Timothy D Spector, Fan Liu, Manfred Kayser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Forensic genetics in the omics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. [Application of HIrisPlex-S System in Forensic DNA Phenotyping].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Male-pattern hair loss: Comprehensive identification of the associated genes as a basis for understanding pathophysiology.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Yan ChenDepartment of Genetic Identification, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pirro HysiDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5752-2510
Carlo MajInstitute for Genomic Statistics and Bioinformatics (IGSB), University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Stefanie Heilmann-HeimbachInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Timothy D SpectorDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fan LiuDepartment of Genetic Identification, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9241-8161
Manfred KayserDepartment of Genetic Identification, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.kayser@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4958-847X
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNKing's College London · GBUniversity of Bonn · DEErasmus MC · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic prediction of male pattern baldness (MPB) is important in science and society. Previous genetic MPB prediction models were limited by sparse marker coverage, small sample size, and/or data dependency in the different analytical steps. Here, we present novel models for genetic prediction of MPB based on a large set of markers and large independent subsample sets drawn among 187,435 European subjects. We selected 117 SNP predictors within 85 distinct loci from a list of 270 previously MPB-associated SNPs in 55,573 males of the UK Biobank Study (UKBB). Based on these 117 SNPs with and without age as additional predictor, we trained, by use of different methods, prediction models in a non-overlapping subset of 104,694 UKBB males and tested them in a non-overlapping subset of 26,177 UKBB males. Estimates of prediction accuracy were similar between methods with AUC ranges of 0.725-0.728 for severe, 0.631-0.635 for moderate, 0.598-0.602 for slight, and 0.708-0.711 for no hair loss with age, and slightly lower without, while prediction of any versus no hair loss gave 0.690-0.711 with age and slightly lower without. External validation in an early-onset enriched MPB dataset from the Bonn Study (N = 991) showed improved prediction accuracy without considering age such as AUC of 0.830 for no vs. any hair loss. Because of the large number of markers and the large independent datasets used for the different analytical steps, the newly presented genetic prediction models are the most reliable ones currently available for MPB or any other human appearance trait.

Indexed as

AlopeciaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideHumansMalePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID36336714
PMCPMC9995341
OpenAlexW4308299869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.