ArticleNeurological research and practice2022
Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world experience of ozanimod in adults with multiple sclerosis.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2026Article
- Siponimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a single-center, real-world cohort study in China.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Siponimod with Up to 2 Years of Treatment in a Real-World Setting in People with SPMS: Analysis from the Novartis Global Managed Access Program.Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease · 2026Article
- Real-world siponimod use in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: the RESYZE study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- A real-world retrospective study to assess the effectiveness and safety profile of siponimod in Chinese patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Siponimod-associated cystoid macular edema without known risk factors.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024Article
- Impact of Siponimod on Clinical and Radiological Parameters of Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Real-World Prospective Study.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Article
- The Need for the Closer Monitoring of Novel Drugs in MS: A Siponimod Retrospective Cohort Study (Realhes Study).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound elastography in the context of preclinical pharmacological research: significance for the 3R principles.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Remyelination in Multiple Sclerosis: Findings in the Cuprizone Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Onboarding of siponimod in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients in Australia: Novel, real-world evidence from the MSGo digital support programme.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTherapeutic options targeting inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) have evolved rapidly for relapsing-remitting MS, whereas few therapies are available for progressive forms of MS, in particular secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The approval of siponimod for SPMS has allowed for optimism in the otherwise discouraging therapeutic landscape.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional study analyzing the efficacy and safety of siponimod under real-world conditions in 227 SPMS patients. According to the retrospective study framework, data was acquired at prespecified time points. Clinical readouts were assessed every three months. Disease progression was determined as increase in expanded disability status scale (EDSS), radiological progression, or the occurrence of new relapses under treatment. For safety analyses, adverse events (AE) and reasons for discontinuation were documented. The collected data points were analyzed at baseline and after 6, 12 and 18 months. However, data were predominately collected at the 6- and 12-month time points as many patients were lost to follow-up. In a group consisting of 41 patients, a more detailed investigation regarding disease progression was conducted, including data from measurement of cognitive and motoric functions.
resultsUnder siponimod therapy, 64.8% of patients experienced sustained clinical disease stability at 12 months. Out of the stable patients 21.4% of patients improved. Of the remaining patients, 31.5% experienced EDSS progression, 3.7% worsened without meeting the threshold for progression. Relapses occurred in 7.4%. Radiological disease activity was detected in 24.1% of patients after six months of treatment and in 29.6% of patients at 12 months follow-up. The in-depth cohort consisting of 41 patients demonstrated no substantial changes in cognitive abilities measured by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test or motoric functions measured with Timed 25-Foot Walk, 100-m timed test, and 9-Hole Peg Test throughout the 12-month study period. Radiological assessment showed a stable volume of white and grey matter, as well as a stable lesion count at 12 months follow-up. AE were observed in nearly half of the included patients, with lymphopenia being the most common. Due to disease progression or AE, 31.2% of patients discontinued therapy.
conclusionTreatment with siponimod had an overall stabilizing effect regarding clinical and radiological outcome measures. However, there is a need for more intensive treatment management and monitoring to identify disease progression and AE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.