Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36336215›Full record

ArticlePharmacological research2022

Efficacy of mucosal vaccination using a protozoan parasite as a vehicle for antigen delivery: IgG and neutralizing response after rectal administration of LeCoVax-2, a candidate vaccine against COVID-19.

Sara Epis, Ilaria Varotto-Boccazzi, Alessandro Manenti, Diego Rubolini, Paolo Gabrieli, Giulia Maria Cattaneo, Louise Gourlay, Francesca Dapporto, Martina Monti, Ilaria Razzano and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sand Fly Fauna and Prevalence ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The non-pathogenic protozoonFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  5. Rectal Administration ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sara EpisDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Pediatric CRC 'Fondazione Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi', University of Milan, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: sara.epis@unimi.it.
Ilaria Varotto-BoccazziDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro ManentiVisMederi, Siena, Italy.
Diego RuboliniDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Water Research Institute-National Research Council of Italy, IRSA-CNR, Brugherio, Italy.
Paolo GabrieliDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Pediatric CRC 'Fondazione Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi', University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giulia Maria CattaneoDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Louise GourlayDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesca DapportoVisMederi, Siena, Italy.
Martina MontiVisMederi, Siena, Italy.
Ilaria RazzanoVisMederi, Siena, Italy.
Margherita LeonardiVisMederi Research, Siena, Italy.
Matteo IannaconeDivision of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Camilla RecordatiMouse and Animal Pathology Laboratory, Fondazione Unimi, and Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Luca BertolaMouse and Animal Pathology Laboratory, Fondazione Unimi, and Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Paolo FiorinaPediatric CRC 'Fondazione Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi', University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Luigi MarvasiGLP Research Center Farefarma-Emozoo, Casole d'Elsa (SI), Italy.
Emanuele MontomoliVisMederi, Siena, Italy; Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Gianvincenzo ZuccottiPediatric CRC 'Fondazione Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi', University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Claudio BandiDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Pediatric CRC 'Fondazione Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi', University of Milan, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: claudio.bandi@unimi.it.
University of Milan · ITVisMederi Research · ITCasa di Cura Villa Pini d’Abruzzo · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITWater Research Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucosal vaccination is regarded as a promising alternative to classical, intramuscular vaccine delivery. However, only a limited number of vaccines have been licensed for mucosal administration in humans. Here we propose Leishmania tarentolae, a protozoan parasite, as a potential antigen vehicle for mucosal vaccination, for administration via the rectal or oral routes. To test this hypothesis, we exploited L. tarentolae for the production and delivery of SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Two antigens were assayed in BALB/c mice: Lt-spike, a L. tarentolae clone engineered for the surface expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; RBD-SD1, a purified portion of the spike protein, produced by another engineered clone of the protozoon. Immune response parameters were then determined at different time points. Both antigens, administered either separately or in combination (Lt-spike + RBD-SD1, hereafter LeCoVax-2), determined significant IgG seroconversion and production of neutralizing antibodies after subcutaneous administration, but only in the presence of adjuvants. After rectal administration, the purified RBD-SD1 antigen did not induce any detectable immune response, in comparison with the intense response observed after administration of LeCoVax-2 or Lt-spike alone. In rectal administration, LeCoVax-2 was also effective when administered without adjuvant. Our results show that L. tarentolae is an efficient and safe scaffold for production and delivery of viral antigens, to be used as vaccines. In addition, rectal vaccination experiments prove that L. tarentolae is suitable as a vaccine vehicle and adjuvant for enteral vaccination. Finally, the combined preparation LeCoVax-2 can be considered as a promising candidate vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, worthy of further investigation.

Indexed as

COVID-19ParasitesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, RectalAnimalsCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin GMiceMice, Inbred BALB CSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusSyndactylyVaccinationAdjuvants, ImmunologicCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2AdjuvantsImmunity to infectionLeishmaniaMucosal vaccinesParasitesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36336215
PMCPMC9633108
OpenAlexW4308739078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.