Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36336084›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2023

Reductions in stillbirths and preterm birth in COVID-19-vaccinated women: a multicenter cohort study of vaccination uptake and perinatal outcomes.

Lisa Hui, Melvin B Marzan, Daniel L Rolnik, Stephanie Potenza, Natasha Pritchard, Joanne M Said, Kirsten R Palmer, Clare L Whitehead, Penelope M Sheehan, Jolyon Ford and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Congenital anomaly registers in Australia: A national challenge.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Effectiveness and Influence of COVID-19 Vaccination on Perinatal Individuals and Their Newborns: An Updated Meta-Analysis.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. COVID-19 Vaccine mRNA Biodistribution: Maternal and Fetal Exposure Risks.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa HuiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Reproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Mercy Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Northern Hospital, Northern Health, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: lisa.hui@unimelb.edu.au.
Melvin B MarzanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Reproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Center for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Daniel L RolnikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia; Harvard T.H. School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Stephanie PotenzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Mercy Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Natasha PritchardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Mercy Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Joanne M SaidDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Joan Kirner Women's and Children's Hospital, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Kirsten R PalmerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Clare L WhiteheadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Penelope M SheehanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Jolyon FordDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Ben W MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Susan P WalkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Mercy Health, Melbourne, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUMonash Health · AUBox Hill Hospital · AUFrankston Hospital · AUHarvard University · USMercy Hospital for Women · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 infection in pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of progression to severe disease, but vaccine uptake by pregnant women is hindered by persistent safety concerns. COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy has been shown to reduce stillbirth, but its relationship with preterm birth is uncertain.

objectiveThis study aimed to measure the rate of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among women giving birth in Melbourne, Australia, and to compare perinatal outcomes by vaccination status. STUDY

designThis was a retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted after the June 2021 government recommendations for messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. Routinely collected data from all 12 public maternity hospitals in Melbourne were extracted on births at ≥20 weeks' gestation from July 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022. Maternal sociodemographic characteristics were analyzed from the total birth cohort. Perinatal outcomes were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated women for whom weeks 20 to 43 of gestation fell entirely within the 9-month data collection period. The primary outcomes were the rates of stillbirth and preterm birth (spontaneous and iatrogenic) in singleton pregnancies of at least 24 weeks' gestation, after exclusion of congenital anomalies. Secondary perinatal outcomes included the rate of congenital anomalies among infants born at ≥20 weeks' gestation and birthweight ≤third centile and newborn intensive care unit admissions among infants born without congenital anomalies at ≥24 weeks' gestation. We calculated the adjusted odds ratio of perinatal outcomes among vaccinated vs unvaccinated women using inverse propensity score-weighting regression adjustment with multiple covariates; P<.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsBirths from 32,536 women were analyzed: 17,365 (53.4%) were vaccinated and 15,171 (47.6%) were unvaccinated. Vaccinated women were more likely to be older, nulliparous, nonsmoking, not requiring an interpreter, of higher socioeconomic status, and vaccinated against pertussis and influenza. Vaccination status also varied by region of birth. Vaccinated women had a significantly lower rate of stillbirth compared with unvaccinated women (0.2% vs 0.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.37; P<.001). Vaccination was associated with a significant reduction in total preterm births at <37 weeks (5.1% vs 9.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.71; P<.001), spontaneous preterm birth (2.4% vs 4.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.96; P=.02), and iatrogenic preterm birth (2.7% vs 5.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.65; P<.001). Infants born to vaccinated mothers also had lower rates of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. There was no significant increase in the rate of congenital anomalies or birthweight ≤3rd centile in vaccinated women. Vaccinated women were significantly less likely to have an infant with a major congenital anomaly compared with the unvaccinated group (2.4% vs 3.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.94; P=.02). This finding remained significant even when the analysis was restricted to women vaccinated before 20 weeks' gestation.

conclusionCOVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was associated with a reduction in stillbirth and preterm birth, and not associated with any adverse impact on fetal growth or development. Vaccine coverage was substantially influenced by known social determinants of health.

Indexed as

COVID-19Premature BirthBirth WeightCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansIatrogenic DiseaseInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesStillbirthVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccinescohort studiesCOVID-19pregnancy outcomepremature birthstillbirthvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36336084
PMCPMC9632261
OpenAlexW4308101908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.