Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36336000›Full record

ArticleChest2023

Association Between Shared Decision-Making During Family Meetings and Surrogates' Trust in Their ICU Physician.

Taylor E Lincoln, Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk, Robert M Arnold, Leslie P Scheunemann, Natalie C Ernecoff, Chung-Chou H Chang, Shannon S Carson, Catherine L Hough, J Randall Curtis, Wendy Anderson and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Taylor E LincolnDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: lincolntb@upmc.edu.
Praewpannarai BuddadhumarukClinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Robert M ArnoldSection of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Leslie P ScheunemannDivision of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Natalie C ErnecoffRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA.
Chung-Chou H ChangClinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Shannon S CarsonDivision of Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Catherine L HoughDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
J Randall CurtisDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Wendy AndersonDepartment of Medicine and Division of Hospital Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Jay SteingrubDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Michael W PetersonDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Fresno Medical Education Program, Fresno, CA.
Bernard LoDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Fresno Medical Education Program, Fresno, CA.
Michael A MatthayDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Baystate, MA.
Douglas B WhiteClinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USOregon Health & Science University · USRAND Corporation · USTufts University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Identifying Effective Strategies to Disclose Prognosis in Patients with ARDSR01HL094553 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WHITE, DOUGLAS B · 2009 to 2012
$2.8M
Mentored Patient Oriented Research in Improving Surrogate Decision Making for Patients with Advanced Respiratory FailureK24HL148314 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Douglas B White · 2019 to 2026
$944k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL148314NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough trust is central to successful physician-family relationships in ICUs, little is known about how to promote surrogates' trust of ICU physicians in this setting. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the conduct of family conferences and physicians' use of shared decision-making (SDM) within family conferences impact surrogates' trust in the physician? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsA mixed-methods secondary analysis was done of a multicenter prospective cohort study of 369 surrogate decision-makers of 204 decisionally incapacitated patients at high risk of death or severe functional impairment within 13 ICUs at six US medical centers between 2008 and 2012. Surrogates completed the Abbreviated Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale (range, 5-25) before and after an audio-recorded family conference conducted within 5 days of ICU admission. We qualitatively coded transcribed conferences to determine physicians' use of five SDM behaviors: discussing surrogate's role, explaining medical condition and prognosis, providing emotional support, assessing understanding, and eliciting patient's values and preferences. Using multivariable linear regression with adjustment for clustering, we assessed whether surrogates' trust in the physician increased after the family meeting; we also examined whether the number of SDM behaviors used by physicians during the family meeting impacted trust scores.

resultsIn adjusted models, conduct of a family meeting was associated with increased trust (average change, pre- to post family meeting: 0.91 point [95% CI, 0.4-1.4; P < .01]). Every additional element of SDM used during the family meeting, including discussing surrogate's role, providing emotional support, assessing understanding, and eliciting patient's values and preferences, was associated with a 0.37-point increase in trust (95% CI, 0.08-0.67; P = .01). If all four elements were used, trust increased by 1.48 points. Explaining medical condition or prognosis was observed in nearly every conference (98.5%) and was excluded from the final model.

interpretationThe conduct of family meetings and physicians' use of SDM behaviors during meetings were both associated with increases in surrogates' trust in the treating physician.

Indexed as

PhysiciansTrustDecision MakingFamilyHumansIntensive Care UnitsProspective Studiescommunicationgoals of careintensive carequalitative methodsshared decision-makingtrust

Identifiers

PMID36336000
PMCPMC10258434
OpenAlexW4308370082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.