Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335976›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. HIV2022

Fee for home delivery and monitoring of antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection compared with standard clinic-based services in South Africa: a randomised controlled trial.

Ruanne V Barnabas, Adam A Szpiro, Xolani Ntinga, Melissa Latigo Mugambi, Heidi van Rooyen, Andrew Bruce, Philip Joseph, Thulani Ngubane, Meighan L Krows, Torin T Schaafsma and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. HIV, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04027153 (The Deliver Health Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04027153 nacompletednot on this map

The Deliver Health Study: A Prospective, Interventional, Randomized Study of Fee for Home ART Delivery in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2019 to 2021Enrolled162ConditionsHIV/AIDSArmsFee based delivery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ruanne V BarnabasDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: rbarnabas@mgh.harvard.edu.
Adam A SzpiroDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Xolani NtingaHuman Sciences Research Council, Sweetwaters, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Melissa Latigo MugambiDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Heidi van RooyenHuman Sciences Research Council, Sweetwaters, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; MRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Andrew BruceDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Philip JosephHuman Sciences Research Council, Sweetwaters, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Thulani NgubaneHuman Sciences Research Council, Sweetwaters, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Meighan L KrowsDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Torin T SchaafsmaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Theodore ZhaoDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Frank TanserAfrica Health Research Institute, Somkhele, South Africa.
Jared M BaetenDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Connie CelumDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alastair van HeerdenHuman Sciences Research Council, Sweetwaters, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; MRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Deliver Health Study Team

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CONNIE L CELUM · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
The design and evaluation of strategies to implement HIV prevention interventions for pregnant women in community pharmacy settingsK01MH122326 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MUGAMBI, MELISSA · 2021 to 2024
$582k
Leveraging routing science to optimize ART delivery for efficient scale-up, high ART coverage, and viral suppression in South AfricaR21MH115770 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BARNABAS, RUANNE VANESSA, VAN HEERDEN, ALASTAIR · 2018 to 2019
$391k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH122326NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH115770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHome delivery and monitoring of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is convenient, overcomes logistical barriers, and could increase individual ART adherence and viral suppression. With client payment and sufficient health benefits, this strategy could be scalable. The aim of the Deliver Health Study was to test the acceptability and efficacy of a user fee for home ART monitoring and delivery.

methodsWe conducted a randomised trial, the Deliver Health Study, of a fee for home delivery of ART compared with free clinic ART delivery in South Africa. People with HIV who were 18 years or older and clinically stable (including CD4 count >100 cells per μL and WHO HIV stage 1-3) were randomly assigned to: (1) fee for home delivery and monitoring of ART, including community ART initiation if needed; or (2) clinic-based ART (standard of care). The one-time fee for home delivery (ZAR 30, 60, and 90; equivalent to US$2, 4, 6) was tiered on the basis of participant income. The primary outcomes were recorded fee payment and acceptability assessed via questionnaire. The key virological secondary outcome was viral suppression with the difference between study groups assessed through robust Poisson regression including participants with viral load measured at exit (modified intention-to-treat analysis). This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04027153) and is complete, with analyses ongoing.

findingsFrom Oct 7, 2019, to Jan 30, 2020, 162 participants were enrolled; 82 were randomly assigned to the fee for home delivery group and 80 to the clinic-based group, with similar characteristics at baseline. Overall, 87 (54%) participants were men, 101 (62%) were on ART, and 98 (60%) were unemployed. In the home delivery group, 40 (49%), 33 (40%), and nine (11%) participants qualified for the ZAR 30, 60, and 90 fee, respectively. Median follow-up was 47 weeks (IQR 43-50) with 96% retention. 80 (98%) participants paid the user fee, with high acceptability and willingness to pay. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis of 155 (96%) participants who completed follow-up, fee for home delivery and monitoring statistically significantly increased viral suppression from 74% to 88% overall (RR 1·21, 95% CI 1·02-1·42); and from 64% to 84% among men (1·31, 1·01-1·71).

interpretationAmong South African adults with HIV, a fee for home delivery and monitoring of ART significantly increased viral suppression compared with clinic-based ART. Clients' paying a fee for home delivery and monitoring of ART was highly acceptable in the context of low income and high unemployment, and improved health outcomes as a result. Home ART delivery and monitoring, potentially with a user fee to offset costs, should be evaluated as a differentiated service delivery strategy to increase access to care.

fundingNational Institutes of Mental Health.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsAdultCD4 Lymphocyte CountFemaleHumansMaleSouth AfricaViral LoadAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID36335976
PMCPMC9722609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.