ArticleOral oncology2022
Mildly dysplastic oral lesions with optically-detectable abnormalities share genetic similarities with severely dysplastic lesions.
Article in Oral oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging Trends in Point-of-Care Technology Development for Oncology in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.JCO global oncology · 2025Review
- Development and Evaluation of an Automated Multimodal Mobile Detection of Oral Cancer Imaging System to Aid in Risk-Based Management of Oral Mucosal Lesions.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Genomic alterations in the stepwise progression from normal mucosa to metastasizing oral squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOptical imaging studies of oral premalignant lesions have shown that optical markers, including loss of autofluorescence and altered morphology of epithelial cell nuclei, are predictive of high-grade pathology. While these optical markers are consistently positive in lesions with moderate/severe dysplasia or cancer, they are positive only in a subset of lesions with mild dysplasia. This study compared the gene expression profiles of lesions with mild dysplasia (stratified by optical marker status) to lesions with severe dysplasia and without dysplasia. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty oral lesions imaged in patients undergoing oral surgery were analyzed: nine without dysplasia, nine with severe dysplasia, and 22 with mild dysplasia. Samples were submitted for high throughput gene expression analysis.
resultsThe analysis revealed 116 genes differentially expressed among sites without dysplasia and sites with severe dysplasia; 50 were correlated with an optical marker quantifying altered nuclear morphology. Ten of 11 sites with mild dysplasia and positive optical markers (91%) had gene expression similar to sites with severe dysplasia. Nine of 11 sites with mild dysplasia and negative optical markers (82%) had similar gene expression as sites without dysplasia.
conclusionThis study suggests that optical imaging may help identify patients with mild dysplasia who require more intensive clinical follow-up. If validated, this would represent a significant advance in patient care for patients with oral premalignant lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.