Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335595›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiac surgery2022

Sutureless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: Surgical and clinical outcomes.

Ricardo Ferreira, Nuno Rua, André Sena, Tiago R Velho, João Gonçalves, Nádia Junqueira, Ana G Almeida, Ângelo Nobre, Fausto Pinto

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiac surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ricardo FerreiraDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0084-3916
Nuno RuaFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
André SenaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
Tiago R VelhoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0455-8189
João GonçalvesDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
Nádia JunqueiraDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana G AlmeidaCentro Cardiovascular da Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ângelo NobreDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
Fausto PintoCentro Cardiovascular da Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Beira Interior · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAortic valve stenosis is the most common adult valve disease in industrialized countries. The aging population and the increase in comorbidities urge the development of safer alternatives to the current surgical treatment. Sutureless bioprosthesis has shown promising results, especially in complex procedures and in patients requiring concomitant surgeries.

objectivesAssess the clinical and hemodynamic performance, safety, and durability of the Perceval® prosthetic valve.

methodsThis single-center retrospective longitudinal cohort study collected data from all adult patients with aortic valve disease who underwent aortic valve replacement with a Perceval® prosthetic valve between February 2015 and October 2020. Of the 196 patients included (mean age 77.20 ± 5.08 years; 45.4% female; mean EuroSCORE II 2.91 ± 2.20%), the majority had aortic stenosis.

resultsOverall mean cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 33.31 ± 14.09 min and 45.55 ± 19.04 min, respectively. Mean intensive care unit and hospital stay were 3.32 ± 3.24 days and 7.70 ± 5.82 days, respectively. Procedural success was 98.99%, as two explants occurred. Four valves were reimplanted due to intraoperative misplacement. Mean transvalvular gradients were 7.82 ± 3.62 mmHg. Pacemaker implantation occurred in 12.8% of patients, new-onset atrial fibrillation in 21.9% and renal replacement support was necessary for 3.1%. Early mortality was 2.0%. We report no structural valve deterioration, strokes, or endocarditis, and one successfully treated valve thrombosis.

conclusionsOur study confirms the excellent clinical and hemodynamic performance and safety of a truly sutureless aortic valve, up to a 5-year follow-up. These results were consistent in isolated and concomitant interventions, solidifying this device as a viable option for the treatment of isolated aortic valve disease.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisBioprosthesisHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeaortic valve diseaseaortic valve replacementaortic valve stenosisPerceval® valvesutureless bioprosthesis

Identifiers

PMID36335595
PMCPMC10099473
OpenAlexW4308290622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.