Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335559›Full record

SynthesisEcology letters2023

Resetting our expectations for parasites and their effects on species interactions: a meta-analysis.

Adam Z Hasik, Daniela de Angeli Dutra, Jean-François Doherty, Meghan A Duffy, Robert Poulin, Adam M Siepielski

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ecology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Editorial: Parasitism: the good, the bad and the ugly.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Adam Z HasikDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4069-7186
Daniela de Angeli DutraDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Jean-François DohertyDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Meghan A DuffyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8142-0802
Robert PoulinDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Adam M SiepielskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9864-743X
University of Otago · NZBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Division of Environmental Biology 1748945Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation 9202University of Otago Doctoral Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the ubiquitous nature of parasitism, how parasitism alters the outcome of host-species interactions such as competition, mutualism and predation remains unknown. Using a phylogenetically informed meta-analysis of 154 studies, we examined how the mean and variance in the outcomes of species interactions differed between parasitized and non-parasitized hosts. Overall, parasitism did not significantly affect the mean or variance of host-species interaction outcomes, nor did the shared evolutionary histories of hosts and parasites have an effect. Instead, there was considerable variation in outcomes, ranging from strongly detrimental to strongly beneficial for infected hosts. Trophically-transmitted parasites increased the negative effects of predation, parasites increased and decreased the negative effects of interspecific competition for parasitized and non-parasitized heterospecifics, respectively, and parasites had particularly strong negative effects on host species interactions in freshwater and marine habitats, yet were beneficial in terrestrial environments. Our results illuminate the diverse ways in which parasites modify critical linkages in ecological networks, implying that whether the cumulative effects of parasitism are considered detrimental depends not only on the interactions between hosts and their parasites but also on the many other interactions that hosts experience.

Indexed as

ParasitesAnimalsEcosystemHost-Parasite InteractionsMotivationPredatory Behaviorcannibalismcompetitionherbivoryhost-parasitemeta-analysismeta-analysis of variancemutualismparasitismpredationspecies interactions

Identifiers

PMID36335559
PMCPMC10099232
OpenAlexW4308294173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.