ArticleInternational journal of hematology2023
Age and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcome of initial cord blood transplantation with FM80TBI as conditioning regimen for acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Older Patients with Hematological Malignancies.Yonago acta medica · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although several studies have reported significant effects of patient age on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the prognostic relevance of age must be determined separately for myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). We analyzed Japanese nationwide transplantation registry data of patients aged 20-79 years with acute myeloid leukemia who underwent allogeneic HCT using MAC (n = 7525) or RIC (n = 3154) between 2008 and 2019. Patient were divided into six groups by age, with each group representing a decade, and overall survival (OS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were compared between adjacent age groups. The adverse impact of age on OS increased each decade starting at age 40 among patients receiving MAC, but only differed significantly between patients in their 50s and 60s among those receiving RIC. In patients receiving both MAC and RIC, the detrimental effect of advanced age on OS was accompanied by an increased risk of NRM. These findings show that age affects NRM and OS significantly, but differs depending on conditioning intensity. RIC mitigates the adverse prognostic impact of older age and is thus considered a reasonable option for older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36335534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.